Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

October 2024 Developments Under President Biden’s AI Executive Order

By Robert Huffman, Susan B. Cassidy, Ashden Fein, Nooree Lee, Ryan Burnette & August Gweon on November 15, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This is part of an ongoing series of Covington blogs on the implementation of Executive Order No. 14110 on the “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence” (the “AI EO”), issued by President Biden on October 30, 2023.  The first blog summarized the AI EO’s key provisions and related OMB guidance, and subsequent blogs described the actions taken by various government agencies to implement the AI EO from November 2023 through September 2024.  This blog describes key actions taken to implement the AI EO during October 2024.  We will discuss developments during October 2024 to implement President Biden’s 2021 Executive Order on Cybersecurity in a separate post. 

White House Issues National Security Memorandum on AI

On October 24, 2024, the White House published a National Security Memorandum on the use of AI models and AI-enabled technologies in national security systems and for military or intelligence purposes (“AI NSM”).  The AI NSM and its accompanying “Framework to Advance AI Governance and Risk Management in National Security” (“AI Framework”) fulfill Section 4.8 of the AI EO, which requires the creation of the AI NSM to guide adoption of AI capabilities in support of U.S. national security and address potential uses of AI by adversaries and other foreign actors.  Among other things, the AI NSM: (1) requires the U.S. AI Safety Institute to conduct voluntary safety tests of frontier AI models before and after their deployment, (2) instructs certain agencies to develop and implement sector-specific AI testing for cyber, nuclear, radiological, chemical, and biological risks, (3) establishes an AI Framework with prohibited uses and minimum risk management practices for AI used for national security, and (4) outlines potential amendments to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) to promote a streamlined and competitive procurement process for safe and reliable AI systems.  Covington will publish a client alert that discusses the AI NSM in more detail, including how the AI NSM may be affected by the upcoming change in presidential administrations. 

OMB Releases AI Procurement Requirements for Federal Agencies

On October 3, 2024, the White House Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) released Memorandum M-24-18, Advancing the Responsible Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in Government (the “Memo”).  The Memo, which implements § 10.1(d)(ii) of the AI Executive Order and the Advancing American AI Act, establishes requirements for ensuring that federal agency contracts for AI systems and services align with the OMB’s March 2024 AI Memo, previously covered here.  Among other things, the Memo requires agency contracts for rights-impacting and safety-impacting AI to include terms for vendor monitoring, documentation, testing, risk mitigation, performance improvements, and incident reporting.  The Memo also establishes documentation and watermarking requirements for vendors of “general use enterprise-wide generative AI” and testing and accuracy requirements for vendors of “AI-based biometric systems.” 

Department of Labor Issues Guidance on AI and Worker Well-Being for Employers and Developers

On October 16, the Department of Labor released a guidance document titled “AI and Worker Well-Being,” which provides employers and AI developers with principles and best practices for protecting workers from potential harms from AI while maximizing potential benefits, as required by § 6(b)(i) of the AI EO.  Recommendations in the guidance include employer notice and disclosure when using AI in the workplace, protections for employee data, and AI audits for disparate or adverse impacts.

Department of Treasury Outbound Investment Rule

On October 28, 2024, the Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) issued a final rule to implement Executive Order 14105, “Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern.”  As we have previously covered here, the final rule prohibits or requires notice for certain transactions involving Chinese or Chinese-owned entities, including transactions involving AI systems designed for military or government intelligence purposes or that meet certain computational thresholds.

Susan B. Cassidy

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government…

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government contractors and represents her clients before the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Inspectors General (IG), and the Department of Justice with regard to those investigations.  From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Cassidy served as in-house counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation, one of the world’s largest defense contractors, supporting both defense and intelligence programs. Previously, Ms. Cassidy held an in-house position with Motorola Inc., leading a team of lawyers supporting sales of commercial communications products and services to US government defense and civilian agencies. Prior to going in-house, Ms. Cassidy was a litigation and government contracts partner in an international law firm headquartered in Washington, DC.

Read more about Susan B. Cassidy
Show more Show less
Photo of Ashden Fein Ashden Fein

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing…

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing security controls and practices for the protection of data and systems, developing and implementing cybersecurity risk management and governance programs, and complying with federal and state regulatory requirements. Mr. Fein frequently supports clients as the lead investigator and crisis manager for global cyber and data security incidents, including data breaches involving personal data, advanced persistent threats targeting intellectual property across industries, state-sponsored theft of sensitive U.S. government information, and destructive attacks.

Additionally, Mr. Fein assists clients from across industries with leading internal investigations and responding to government inquiries related to the U.S. national security. He also advises aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors on security compliance under U.S. national security laws and regulations including, among others, the National Industrial Security Program (NISPOM), U.S. government cybersecurity regulations, and requirements related to supply chain security.

Before joining Covington, Mr. Fein served on active duty in the U.S. Army as a Military Intelligence officer and prosecutor specializing in cybercrime and national security investigations and prosecutions — to include serving as the lead trial lawyer in the prosecution of Private Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for the unlawful disclosure of classified information to Wikileaks.

Mr. Fein currently serves as a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army Reserve.

Read more about Ashden Fein
Show more Show less
Photo of Nooree Lee Nooree Lee

Nooree Lee represents government contractors in a wide variety of transactional, litigation, and compliance matters. His primary areas of practice include corporate transactions involving contractors, international contracting and domestic sourcing matters, and grants and cooperative agreements.

Mr. Lee also advises clients in a…

Nooree Lee represents government contractors in a wide variety of transactional, litigation, and compliance matters. His primary areas of practice include corporate transactions involving contractors, international contracting and domestic sourcing matters, and grants and cooperative agreements.

Mr. Lee also advises clients in a wide range of industries on how to best safeguard and leverage their intellectual property. Relatedly, he represents companies seeking to protect their confidential data from disclosure under the federal Freedom of Information Act and state law equivalents.

Read more about Nooree LeeNooree's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the…

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the Cost Accounting Standards.  Prior to joining Covington, Mr. Burnette served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he worked on government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.

Read more about Ryan Burnette
Show more Show less
August Gweon

August Gweon counsels national and multinational companies on data privacy, cybersecurity, antitrust, and technology policy issues, including issues related to artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. August leverages his experiences in AI and technology policy to help clients understand complex technology developments, risks…

August Gweon counsels national and multinational companies on data privacy, cybersecurity, antitrust, and technology policy issues, including issues related to artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. August leverages his experiences in AI and technology policy to help clients understand complex technology developments, risks, and policy trends.

August regularly provides advice to clients for complying with federal, state, and global privacy and competition frameworks and AI regulations. He also assists clients in investigating compliance issues, preparing for federal and state privacy regulations like the California Privacy Rights Act, responding to government inquiries and investigations, and engaging in public policy discussions and rulemaking processes.

Read more about August Gweon
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative, Government
  • Blog:
    Inside Government Contracts
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo