Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Timeline of Key Developments Related to Recent Executive Actions:  April Edition

By Scott A. Freling, Jay Carey, Kayleigh Scalzo, Jennifer Plitsch, Lindsay Burke, Michael Wagner, Andrew Guy, Victoria Skiera & Ethan Syster on April 10, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As the second Trump Administration enters its third month, Covington’s Government Contracts Practice is continuing to track the latest developments related to recent executive actions.  This April edition of our key developments timeline has been condensed to provide a targeted overview of the developments this month most relevant to contractors.  For a detailed version of the timeline as of April 2, 2025, including background on some of the developments discussed below, please see our post here.

This timeline highlights key developments pertaining to recent executive orders (“EOs”) and other executive actions issued by the second Trump administration.  It focuses on issues most relevant to federal contractors and grant recipients, and is divided into five topics: (1) Federal Funding; (2) DEI and Gender; (3) Energy and Environment; (4) Trade and Foreign Aid; and (5) DOGE.  Covington’s Government Contracts Practice is continuing to track these and other developments and will plan to periodically update this timeline.

This timeline provides a high-level summary of recent events and is not exhaustive. In addition, this timeline was last updated on April 17, 2025.  To the extent you may have questions regarding any of the developments discussed below — or other matters — please reach out to a member of Covington’s Government Contracts Practice.

1. Federal Funding

  • April 4: In the NIH rate cap cases (Commonwealth of Mass. v. NIH, Association of American Medical Colleges v. NIH, Association of American Universities v. HHS), D. Mass. granted defendants’ assented-to motion to convert the court’s preliminary injunction into a permanent injunction and to enter final judgment.
  • April 5: In State of New York v. Trump, defendants filed an emergency motion for reconsideration or stay pending appeal of D.R.I.’s order enforcing the preliminary injunction with respect to FEMA funding, in light of the Supreme Court’s grant of a stay pending appeal in State of California v. U.S. Department of Education.
  • April 8: In the NIH rate cap cases (Commonwealth of Mass. v. NIH, Association of American Medical Colleges v. NIH, Association of American Universities v. HHS), defendants filed a notice of appeal to the First Circuit of D. Mass’s permanent injunction.
  • April 10: In American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education v. McMahon, the Fourth Circuit issued an order granting the government’s motion to stay D. Md.’s preliminary injunction, which had required reinstatement of certain Department of Education grants.
  • April 11: The Department of Energy issued Policy Flash 2025-22, “Adjusting Department of Energy Grant Policy for Institutions of Higher Education (IHE),” which announced that “[a]ll future Department grant awards to IHEs will default to [a] 15 percent indirect cost rate.”
  • April 14:
    • In State of New York v. Trump, D.R.I. denied defendants’ motion for reconsideration or stay.
    • Complaint and motion for TRO were filed in Association of American Universities v. Department of Energy, No. 1:25-cv-10912 (D. Mass.), challenging the Department of Energy’s indirect rate cap policy.
  • April 16: In Association of American Universities v. Department of Energy, D. Mass. granted plaintiffs’ motion for TRO.

2. DEI and Gender

  • April 1: In Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump, N.D. Ill. issued an amended TRO blocking certain provisions of EO 14173.  Among other things, the TRO prohibits the Department of Labor from requiring “any grantee or contractor to make any ‘certification’ or other representation pursuant to the Certification Provision [of EO 14173].”  The “Government” is also prohibited from initiating False Claims Act enforcement against the plaintiff pursuant to the certification provision.
  • April 4: In State of California v. U.S. Department of Education, the Supreme Court granted a stay pending appeal of D. Mass’s TRO blocking the government’s termination of education grants.
  • April 9: In State of California v. U.S. Department of Education, D. Mass. terminated plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction as moot in light of plaintiffs’ notice of withdrawal following the Supreme Court’s decision to grant a stay pending appeal of the TRO.
  • April 10: In Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump, N.D. Ill. held a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, and extended its TRO through April 17, 2025.
  • April 14: In Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump, N.D. Ill. partially granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, via a memorandum opinion and order enjoining the Department of Labor “from requiring any grantee or contractor to make a certification pursuant to section 3(b)(iv) of [EO] 14173” and “from applying section 2(b)(i) of [EO] 14151 against [the plaintiff] to prevent termination of its Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations grant.”
  • April 15: In Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump, N.D. Ill. issued an order on plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction.

3. Energy and Environment

  • April 8: President Trump issued a number of actions related to energy and the environment:
    • EO 14261, “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry and Amending Executive Order 14241,” which, among other things, directs the Chair of the National Energy Dominance Council to designate coal as a “mineral” within the meaning of EO 14241; directs a report assessing the impediment of mining coal resources and reserves on federal lands; and directs the identification of regions where coal-powered infrastructure is available to support AI data centers.
    • Proclamation “Regulatory Relief for Certain Stationary Sources to Promote American Energy,” which declares certain stationary sources exempt from the EPA’s May 2024 rule imposing more stringent Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.
    • EO 14260, “Protecting American Energy from State Overreach,” which directs the Attorney General to identify and stop the enforcement of state and local laws burdening domestic energy resources “that are or may be unconstitutional, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable.” 
    • EO 14262, “Strengthening the Reliability and Security of the United States Electric Grid,” which directs the Secretary of Energy to “streamline, systemize, and expedite the Department of Energy’s processes for issuing orders under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act” during periods “when the relevant grid operator forecasts a temporary interruption of electricity supply is necessary to prevent a complete grid failure.”  It further directs the Secretary of Energy to “develop a uniform methodology for analyzing current and anticipated reserve margins for all regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and shall utilize this methodology to identify current and anticipated regions with reserve margins below acceptable thresholds as identified by the Secretary of Energy.”
  • April 9: President Trump issued EO 14270, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy,” which aims to rescind unnecessary energy-regulated regulations.
    • For more details on the “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting” EO, and several other executive actions promulgated on the same day, see our overview here.
  • April 15: In Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council v. USDA, a case brought by nonprofits challenging the freeze of Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (“IIJA”) funds pursuant to EO 14154 and Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) memorandum M-25-11, D.R.I. issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the freeze. 

4. Trade and Foreign Aid

  • April 1: In AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. United States Department of State and Global Health Council v. Trump, defendants filed a notice of appeal to the D.C. Circuit from D.D.C.’s preliminary injunction “and from all orders antecedent to such order and opinion and thus incorporated therein.”
  • April 2: President Trump issued EO 14257, “Regulating Imports With a Reciprocal Tariff To Rectify Trade Practices That Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits,” which establishes a reciprocal trade policy and links to Annex I, which sets forth the scheduled increase of the ad valorem import duty on certain trading partners.
  • April 3: Pursuant to the America First Trade Policy Memorandum, the heads of several departments issued a report to President Trump on the America First Trade Policy.
  • April 8: President Trump issued EO 14259, “Amendment to Reciprocal Tariffs and Updated Duties as Applied to Low-Value Imports from the People’s Republic of China,” which directs increases in tariffs on certain goods imported from China in response to China’s announcement that it will retaliate against the U.S. in response to EO 14257.
  • April 9: President Trump issued EO 14266, “Modifying Reciprocal Tariff Rates to Reflect Trading Partner Retaliation and Alignment,” which temporarily suspends tariffs other than those imposed on China.
  • April 11:
    • President Trump issued Memorandum titled “Clarification of Exceptions Under Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, as Amended,” clarifying the scope of the semiconductor exemption from EO 14257 by tying the definition to specific product headings and subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. 
    • In AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. United States Department of State and Global Health Council v. Trump, defendants filed a motion for indicative ruling on D.D.C.’s preliminary injunction, in light of Department of Education v. California, and moved for a partial administrative stay pending that ruling.  D.D.C. granted the partial administrative stay via minute order.

5. DOGE

  • April 3:
    • Principal Director, Defense Pricing, Contracting, and Acquisition Policy issued memorandum “Reporting Instructions to Comply with Presidential Action Memorandum ‘Radical Transparency About Wasteful Spending’ dated February 18, 2025.”
    • OMB issued memorandum “Driving Efficient Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in Government.”  We covered this memorandum further here.
  • April 4: DCAA announced a reorganization initiative “in response to increasing pressure to reduce costs and improve operational efficiency.”
  • April 10: Secretary of Defense issued memorandum, “Continuing Elimination of Wasteful Spending at the DoD,” which directs termination of certain IT services contracts and preparation of a plan for how DoD will in-source IT consulting and management services.
  • April 15: President Trump issued two EOs aimed at procurement efficiency, “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement,” and “Ensuring Commercial, Cost-Effective Solutions in Federal Contracts,” which, among other things, direct a reform of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and a review of pending non-commercial contracts.  We cover both EOs in more detail here.
Photo of Scott A. Freling Scott A. Freling

Scott Freling represents civilian and defense contractors, at all stages of the procurement process, in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers and with other contractors. He has a broad-based government contracts practice, which includes compliance counseling, internal investigations, strategic procurement…

Scott Freling represents civilian and defense contractors, at all stages of the procurement process, in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers and with other contractors. He has a broad-based government contracts practice, which includes compliance counseling, internal investigations, strategic procurement advice, claims and other disputes, teaming and subcontracting, and mergers and acquisitions. He represents clients in federal and state court litigation and administrative proceedings, including bid protests before the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He also represents clients in obtaining and maintaining SAFETY Act liability protection for anti-terrorism technologies. Mr. Freling’s experience covers a wide variety of industries, including defense and aerospace, information technology and software, government services, life sciences, renewable energy, and private equity investment in government contractors.

Read more about Scott A. Freling
Show more Show less
Photo of Jay Carey Jay Carey

A Chambers-rated government contracts practitioner, Jay Carey focuses his practice on bid protests, and regularly represents government contractors before the U.S. Government Accountability Office and the Court of Federal Claims. He has prosecuted and defended more than 80 protests, including some of…

A Chambers-rated government contracts practitioner, Jay Carey focuses his practice on bid protests, and regularly represents government contractors before the U.S. Government Accountability Office and the Court of Federal Claims. He has prosecuted and defended more than 80 protests, including some of the most high-profile protests in recent years, for clients in the aerospace and defense, biotechnology, healthcare, information technology, and telecommunications sectors. Mr. Carey also counsels clients on compliance matters and all aspects of federal, state, and local government procurement and grant law. He counsels clients extensively on organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs) and on strategies for protecting and preserving intellectual property rights (in patents, data, and software).

Read more about Jay Carey
Show more Show less
Photo of Kayleigh Scalzo Kayleigh Scalzo

Kayleigh Scalzo advises clients on an array of contracting and procurement issues, and has litigated bid protests in both the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Read more about Kayleigh Scalzo
Photo of Jennifer Plitsch Jennifer Plitsch

Jennifer Plitsch is co-chair of the firm’s Government Contracts practice group. Her practice includes a wide range of contracting issues for large and small businesses in both defense and civilian contracting. Her practice involves advising clients on contract proposal, performance, and compliance questions…

Jennifer Plitsch is co-chair of the firm’s Government Contracts practice group. Her practice includes a wide range of contracting issues for large and small businesses in both defense and civilian contracting. Her practice involves advising clients on contract proposal, performance, and compliance questions as well as transactional and legislative issues. Her practice also includes bid protest and contract claims and appeals litigation before GAO, agency boards and the federal courts. Ms. Plitsch has particular expertise in advising clients in the pharmaceutical and biologics industry. She advises a range of pharmaceutical and biologics manufacturers on Federal Supply Schedule contracts, including the complex pricing requirements imposed on products under the Veterans Health Care Act, as well as research and development contracts and grants with various federal agencies. She also has significant experience advising on the requirements of various programs under which vaccine products and biodefense medical countermeasures are procured by the Government.

Read more about Jennifer Plitsch
Show more Show less
Photo of Lindsay Burke Lindsay Burke
Read more about Lindsay Burke
Photo of Michael Wagner Michael Wagner

Mike Wagner helps government contractors navigate high-stakes enforcement matters and complex regulatory regimes.

Combining deep regulatory knowledge with extensive investigations experience, Mr. Wagner works closely with contractors across a range of industries to achieve the efficient resolution of regulatory enforcement actions and government…

Mike Wagner helps government contractors navigate high-stakes enforcement matters and complex regulatory regimes.

Combining deep regulatory knowledge with extensive investigations experience, Mr. Wagner works closely with contractors across a range of industries to achieve the efficient resolution of regulatory enforcement actions and government investigations, including False Claims Act cases. He has particular expertise representing individuals and companies in suspension and debarment proceedings, and he has successfully resolved numerous such matters at both the agency and district court level. He also routinely conducts internal investigations of potential compliance issues and advises clients on voluntary and mandatory disclosures to federal agencies.

In his contract disputes and advisory work, Mr. Wagner helps government contractors resolve complex issues arising at all stages of the public procurement process. As lead counsel, he has successfully litigated disputes at the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, and he regularly assists contractors in preparing and pursuing contract claims. In his counseling practice, Mr. Wagner advises clients on best practices for managing a host of compliance obligations, including domestic sourcing requirements under the Buy American Act and Trade Agreements Act, safeguarding and reporting requirements under cybersecurity regulations, and pricing obligations under the GSA Schedules program. And he routinely assists contractors in navigating issues and disputes that arise during negotiations over teaming agreements and subcontracts.

Read more about Michael Wagner
Show more Show less
Andrew Guy

Andrew Guy is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Government Contracts practice group.

Read more about Andrew Guy
Victoria Skiera

Victoria Skiera is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She is a member of the government contracts practice group and maintains an active pro bono practice.

Read more about Victoria Skiera
Ethan Syster

Ethan Syster is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC Office. He is a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Ethan assists clients with a broad range of issues across all stages of the public procurement process.

Read more about Ethan Syster
  • Posted in:
    Administrative, Government
  • Blog:
    Inside Government Contracts
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo