Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

White House Issues New Cybersecurity Executive Order

By Ashden Fein, Susan B. Cassidy, Robert Huffman, Micaela McMurrough, Caleb Skeath, Joshua Williams, Ryan Burnette, Shayan Karbassi, Sierra Stubbs & Kristen Chapman on June 9, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 6, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (“Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation’s Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144”) (the “Order”) that modifies certain initiatives in prior Executive Orders issued by Presidents Obama and Biden and highlights key cybersecurity priorities for the current Administration.  Specifically, the Order (i) directs that existing federal government regulations and policy be revised to focus on securing third-party software supply chains, quantum cryptography, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices and (ii) more expressly focuses cybersecurity-related sanctions authorities on “foreign” persons.  Although the Order makes certain changes to prior cybersecurity related Executive Orders issued under previous administrations, it generally leaves the framework of those Executive Orders in place.  Further, it does not appear to modify other cybersecurity Executive Orders.[1]  To that end, although the Order highlights some areas where the Trump administration has taken a different approach than prior administrations, it also signals a more general alignment between administrations on core cybersecurity principles.

The first section below provides a summary of revisions to existing federal government policy.  The second section provides a chart of new directives to federal government departments and agencies.

Amendments to Prior Orders

The new Order seeks to amend existing federal government policies and regulations (as previously set by Executive Orders 14144 and 13694) to: (i) remove certain requirements for secure software development attestations, directives tied to acceptance of digital identity documentation, and certain technical hardening measures for identity verification and email encryption, and (ii) more expressly focus cybersecurity-related sanctions authorities specifically to foreign (as opposed to any) cyber threat actors that target U.S. critical infrastructure.

  • Secure Software Acquisition:  The Order removes certain requirements relating to secure software attestations that federal government contractors must submit to contracting agencies.  This includes elimination of the requirement that attestations must be in machine readable format.  This also includes elimination of the directive for centralized validation of software attestations by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”).  Likewise, the associated directive to the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) to incorporate those requirements has also been eliminated.  The Fact Sheet accompanying the Order notes that one goal was to eliminate requirements for “imposing unproven and burdensome software accounting processes that prioritized compliance checklists over genuine security investments.”  However, the Order did not address the more general requirement for software attestations that appeared in the May 2021 Executive Order No. 14028 “Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity,” as implemented through Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) Memoranda (M-23-16 and M-22-18) and the CISA Common Self-Attestation Form.  Thus, it is unclear whether this Administration will promulgate regulations that would implement those requirements from the 2021 EO within the FAR, suspend any requirement for further attestations until NIST issues the final update of its Secure Software Development Framework required by the Order, eliminate the requirement for attestations altogether, or impose attestation requirements  on a contract-by-contract basis and continue to maintain the CISA repository for those forms.
  • Solutions to Combat Cyber Crime and Fraud:  The Order removes prior directives for federal government agencies to accept digital identity documentation (e.g., digital driver’s licenses) for public benefit programs.
  • Identity Technologies: The Order removes prior requirements for the Federal Civilian Executive Branch (“FCEB”) to deploy commercial phishing-resistant standards such as “WebAuthn.”
  • Email Encryption: The Order removes a directive to OMB to require the expanded use of authenticated transport-layer encryption (“TLS”) between email servers used by FCEB agencies to send and receive emails.
  • Quantum Computing:  The Order scales back quantum computing initiatives, included as part of National Security Memorandum 10 (“NSM-10”)(“On Promoting United States Leadership in Quantum Computing While Mitigating Risk to Vulnerable Cryptographic Systems,” May 4, 2022) implemented through OMB Memorandum (M-23-02), that required federal agencies to adopt post-quantum cryptography (“PQC”) as quickly as feasible and encourage technology vendors to do the same, as well as pushing for it being accepted internationally.  The Order retains only a requirement for CISA to maintain a list of product categories where PQC-enabled tools are widely available.
  • Artificial Intelligence (“AI”): The Order takes a different approach to previous policy, amending E.O. 14144’s existing approach to security with and within AI, and diverges from previously revoked E.O. 14110 (“Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence,” October 30, 2023), which encouraged AI-driven collaboration across industry and had tasked federal agencies with aggressively exploring artificial intelligence for cybersecurity defense.
  • Focus on “Foreign” Cyber Threat Actors: The Order amends existing cybersecurity-related sanctions authorities for malicious actors engaged in cyber-enabled activities that pose a threat to U.S. national security, foreign policy, economic health, or financial stability, including those targeting U.S. critical infrastructure, to limit these authorities to foreign malicious actors and thereby more clearly excluding domestic individuals or activities from the scope of the authorities.  The accompanying Fact Sheet further explains that the focus on foreign malicious actors is to prevent “misuse” of the sanctions authorities “against domestic political opponents,” and clarifies that “sanctions do not apply to election-related activities.”  The Order and the accompanying Fact Sheet do not provide any additional information about whether the amendments are intended to exempt foreign cyber operations directed at U.S. election activities, though the underlying sanctions authorities do still address malicious cyber-enabled activities that involve “tampering with, altering, or causing a misappropriation of information with the purpose of or that involves interfering with or undermining election processes or institutions.”

The Federal Communications Commission’s cybersecurity labeling program, Cybersecurity Labeling for Internet of Things (proposed rule, 47 CFR Part 8) has remained.  This program was modeled after the Energy Star efficiency label and will certify internet-connected consumer products, such as IoT devices, based on whether they meet certain cybersecurity criteria verified by accredited labs.

Timeline of New Directives

The below table outlines the directives to federal government departments and agencies, including: the Departments of Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security as well as CISA, OMB, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (“ODNI”), the National Security Agency (“NSA”), the National Science Foundation (“NSF”), the Office of Science and Technology Policy (“OSTP”), and the Office of the National Cyber Director (“ONCD”).[2]

Table 1:  Summary of directives to Departments and Agencies.


[1] Section 2 also provides, “Except as specifically provided for in subsection 4(f) of [Executive Order 14144], sections 1 through 7 of [Executive Order 14144] shall not apply to Federal information systems that are NSS or are otherwise identified by the Department of Defense or the Intelligence Community as debilitating impact systems.”


[2] For example, the Order does not rescind or modify Biden’s Executive Order 14028 (“Including Biden’s Executive Order 14028”). 

Photo of Ashden Fein Ashden Fein

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing…

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing security controls and practices for the protection of data and systems, developing and implementing cybersecurity risk management and governance programs, and complying with federal and state regulatory requirements. Mr. Fein frequently supports clients as the lead investigator and crisis manager for global cyber and data security incidents, including data breaches involving personal data, advanced persistent threats targeting intellectual property across industries, state-sponsored theft of sensitive U.S. government information, and destructive attacks.

Additionally, Mr. Fein assists clients from across industries with leading internal investigations and responding to government inquiries related to the U.S. national security. He also advises aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors on security compliance under U.S. national security laws and regulations including, among others, the National Industrial Security Program (NISPOM), U.S. government cybersecurity regulations, and requirements related to supply chain security.

Before joining Covington, Mr. Fein served on active duty in the U.S. Army as a Military Intelligence officer and prosecutor specializing in cybercrime and national security investigations and prosecutions — to include serving as the lead trial lawyer in the prosecution of Private Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for the unlawful disclosure of classified information to Wikileaks.

Mr. Fein currently serves as a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army Reserve.

Read more about Ashden Fein
Show more Show less
Susan B. Cassidy

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government…

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government contractors and represents her clients before the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Inspectors General (IG), and the Department of Justice with regard to those investigations.  From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Cassidy served as in-house counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation, one of the world’s largest defense contractors, supporting both defense and intelligence programs. Previously, Ms. Cassidy held an in-house position with Motorola Inc., leading a team of lawyers supporting sales of commercial communications products and services to US government defense and civilian agencies. Prior to going in-house, Ms. Cassidy was a litigation and government contracts partner in an international law firm headquartered in Washington, DC.

Read more about Susan B. Cassidy
Show more Show less
Photo of Micaela McMurrough Micaela McMurrough
Read more about Micaela McMurrough
Photo of Caleb Skeath Caleb Skeath

Caleb Skeath advises clients on a broad range of privacy and data security issues, including regulatory inquiries from the Federal Trade Commission, data breach notification obligations, compliance with consumer protection laws, and state and federal laws regarding educational and financial privacy.

Read more about Caleb Skeath
Photo of Joshua Williams Joshua Williams
Read more about Joshua Williams
Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the…

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the Cost Accounting Standards.  Prior to joining Covington, Mr. Burnette served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he worked on government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.

Read more about Ryan Burnette
Show more Show less
Photo of Shayan Karbassi Shayan Karbassi

Shayan Karbassi is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the firm’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and White Collar and Investigations Practice Groups. Shayan advises clients on a range of cybersecurity and national security matters. He also…

Shayan Karbassi is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the firm’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and White Collar and Investigations Practice Groups. Shayan advises clients on a range of cybersecurity and national security matters. He also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Read more about Shayan Karbassi
Show more Show less
Photo of Sierra Stubbs Sierra Stubbs

Sierra Stubbs advises clients on a wide range of cybersecurity, data privacy, artificial intelligence, and public policy matters. As part of her data privacy and cybersecurity practice, Sierra helps clients navigate government and internal investigations, cybersecurity incident response, and compliance with U.S. state…

Sierra Stubbs advises clients on a wide range of cybersecurity, data privacy, artificial intelligence, and public policy matters. As part of her data privacy and cybersecurity practice, Sierra helps clients navigate government and internal investigations, cybersecurity incident response, and compliance with U.S. state and federal privacy and cybersecurity laws and standards. As part of her public policy practice, Sierra supports the development of clients’ public policy strategies and initiatives, including those related to intellectual property, innovation, and artificial intelligence.

Prior to joining Covington, Sierra served in the Office of the Chief of Staff to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, most recently as a Special Advisor.

Read more about Sierra Stubbs
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Inside Privacy
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo