Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Colorado Delays AI Act Compliance: What Lawyers and Business Leaders Need to Know

By Erik Dullea on August 27, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
AI Illustration

Key point: During Colorado’s legislative special session, which aimed to address budgetary shortfalls resulting from this year’s federal appropriations act, lawmakers approved a delay in the Colorado AI Act’s effective dates.

Colorado lawmakers amended the Colorado AI Act, shifting the law’s effective date from February 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026. This delay applies to compliance obligations for developers and deployers of high-risk artificial intelligence systems. The amendment followed significant resistance from the technology and business communities, who are generally opposed to the original law. Whether the July 2025 White House AI Action Plan will provide further incentives or pressure on the legislature to revise the core obligations, as discussed here, is unclear.

For compliance professionals, the amendment provides a uniform extension to implement risk-management programs, conduct impact assessments, and prepare required disclosures, but the content and scope of these obligations remain unchanged. Organizations will still need to:

  • Use reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination
  • Maintain detailed documentation, and
  • Provide clear public statements about their AI systems and risk mitigation strategies.

Compliance and Legal teams should keep in mind that the law’s delegation of authority to the Attorney General to develop regulations remains substantively unchanged, as there was no deadline for the adoption of rules or regulations in the original text.

Bottom line: The delay provides developers, deployers (and legislators) with a few months of breathing room to comply with (or further amend) the obligations in the original law.

Photo of Erik Dullea Erik Dullea

A member of Husch Blackwell’s Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation team, Erik focuses on administrative/regulatory law, with an emphasis on heavily regulated industries and government contractors. He represents mine operators in MSHA enforcement actions, energy and industrial companies in OSHA enforcement actions, and advises…

A member of Husch Blackwell’s Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation team, Erik focuses on administrative/regulatory law, with an emphasis on heavily regulated industries and government contractors. He represents mine operators in MSHA enforcement actions, energy and industrial companies in OSHA enforcement actions, and advises airlines and their pilots challenging FAA and DOT enforcement actions. Erik advises government contractors on transactional matters, bid protests and civil litigation. He holds an active security clearance and has 20 years of experience in the aviation industry as both a Navy pilot and a commercial pilot. Erik is a co-chair of Husch Blackwell’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems practice group.

Read more about Erik DulleaErik's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Byte Back
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo