In Litton v. Roblox Corp., California Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang rejected Defendants proposed changes from the Model Protective Order primarily addressing the use of Confidential/Highly Confidential Information with an AI tool, stating: “Because there already exists a set of provisions addressing AI tools in that Standing Order, Defendants did not demonstrate sufficient cause to overcome the presumption of reasonableness and to warrant editing the Model Protective Order to address those same issues.”
The post Changes from the Model Protective Order to Address AI Rejected by Court: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.