In Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc., California Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman rejected plaintiff’s contentions that prompts and outputs that did not support Plaintiffs’ claims were protected by attorney work product and were irrelevant, granting the request to compel production of OpenAI account information for the individuals who conducted ChatGPT testing, all prompts and outputs for Plaintiffs’ testing of ChatGPT in connection with their pre-suit ChatGPT testing, and documentation of Plaintiffs’ testing process.
The post Prompts and Outputs Must Be Produced, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.