Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

House Passes Remote Access Security Act to Limit Adversaries’ Remote Access to Critical Technology

By Scott Wise, Jeremy Iloulian & Dmitry Bergoltsev on January 14, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 12, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelming passed (369-22) the Remote Access Security Act, modernizing U.S. export controls to address foreign adversaries’ remote access to controlled technologies through cloud computing services.  

Currently, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) does not consider the provision of cloud computing services to be exports. If passed into law, the bill (H.R. 2683) would modify the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to authorize BIS to regulate the remote access of items, in addition to the export, reexport, and transfer of items, as well as issue licenses and impose penalties related to remote access of export controlled items.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY-17), directly responds to concerns that Chinese entities have exploited cloud services to evade U.S. export controls on advanced semiconductors and AI technologies by accessing computing power remotely through offshore data centers. It would apply U.S. export control restrictions to remote access and cloud-based exposure of controlled items—including advanced AI chips and semiconductors. In addition, the bill could significantly disrupt cloud computing companies’ compliance operations, which have been based on the understanding that the provision of cloud computing power does not qualify as an export for nearly twenty years.

The Remote Access Security Act would not become law until passage in the Senate and signature by the President. Senators David McCormick (R-PA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Chris Coons (D-DE) and the sponsors and cosponsors of the Senate version (S. 3519).

Key Takeaways

  • Companies should expect increased regulatory scrutiny of cloud service arrangements involving foreign users, particularly those with potential ties to China. Enhanced due diligence, customer verification, and transaction-level documentation procedures will be necessary for compliance.
  • The policy implications of this bill extend beyond traditional hardware manufacturers to cloud service providers, data center operators, and technology platforms offering remote computing capabilities.
Photo of Scott Wise Scott Wise

Scott Wise is a partner in Crowell’s Denver office and a member of the firm’s International Trade Group. His practice focuses on export controls, economic sanctions, and outbound investment issues across industries, with an emphasis on emerging technologies and the technology industry.

Working

…

Scott Wise is a partner in Crowell’s Denver office and a member of the firm’s International Trade Group. His practice focuses on export controls, economic sanctions, and outbound investment issues across industries, with an emphasis on emerging technologies and the technology industry.

Working with established and start-up tech companies, Scott helps clients to develop unique compliance programs that are responsive to the full range of regulations governing the exports of goods and services. He also trains and counsels clients on compliance with relevant export control regulations such as the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). In addition to technology companies, Scott advises companies in the aerospace and aviation, automotive, chemical, defense, electronics, energy, engineering, financial and insurance, manufacturing, professional services, security, and transportation industries, among others.

Prior to joining Crowell, Scott was the Assistant General Counsel for Global Trade at a multinational technology company where he led a consolidated team focusing on export controls, economic sanctions, and outbound investment. He was the lead export controls and economic sanctions attorney for key business groups ranging from emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing, to aerospace and defense contracts, and to commercial software and gaming. In that role, Scott developed the company’s compliance approach to new regulations governing the export of various  new technologies, including AI, integrated circuits and chips, and quantum computing, which involved coordination between senior government officials and business leaders. Scott also has prior law firm experience in the international trade practice area.

Read more about Scott Wise
Show more Show less
Photo of Jeremy Iloulian Jeremy Iloulian

Jeremy Iloulian is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Chicago office and is a member of the International Trade Group. Jeremy advises clients globally on complex cross-border investigative, regulatory, compliance, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade…

Jeremy Iloulian is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Chicago office and is a member of the International Trade Group. Jeremy advises clients globally on complex cross-border investigative, regulatory, compliance, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to U.S. export controls, economic sanctions, anti-boycott laws, and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Read more about Jeremy Iloulian
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    International
  • Blog:
    International Trade Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo