Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

White House Releases New National Cyber Strategy and Executive Order

By Ashden Fein, Caleb Skeath, Susan B. Cassidy, Robert Huffman, Ryan Burnette, Alexandra Cooper-Ponte, Matthew Harden, Shayan Karbassi & Grace Howard on March 10, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 6, 2026, the Administration released “President Trump’s Cyber Strategy for America” alongside an Executive Order (entitled “Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes Against American Citizens”) and accompanying Fact Sheet.  The framework set forth in the Strategy document is significantly shorter and higher-level than the prior National Cybersecurity Strategy issued in March 2023.  We have summarized below the highlights of the Strategy document (Part I) and the Executive Order (Part II), along with key takeaways from each and areas to watch going forward. 

Part I: Cyber Strategy for America

The Cyber Strategy signals the Administration’s focus on deploying offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, enlisting the support of the private sector, hardening and modernizing critical infrastructure and federal networks, streamlining the regulatory environment, and promoting innovation in emerging technologies.  

As detailed below, the Strategy outlines six “Pillars of Action”:  

  1. Shape Adversary Behavior: Deploy defensive and offensive cyber operations using federal resources.  Notably, under the Strategy, the government “will unleash the private sector by creating incentives to identify and disrupt adversary networks and scale our national capabilities.”  The Strategy also highlights the need to dismantle criminal infrastructure, including financial infrastructure. 
  2. Promote Common‑Sense Regulation: Streamline cybersecurity and data regulations to reduce compliance burdens, align government and industry, and preserve Americans’ privacy.  This is consistent with the Administration’s recent efforts to align the final Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (“CIRCIA”) with industry preferences to reduce regulatory burden and to harmonize reporting obligations.  (The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) plans to convene a series of public town halls to solicit stakeholder feedback on that proposal in the coming weeks.)  Prior public reporting has also suggested that the Administration intends to review a number of other key policies in connection with its release of the Strategy.  Additionally, the National Cyber Director, Sean Cairncross, indicated in remarks yesterday that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 2023 incident disclosure rule may be revisited.
  3. Modernize and Secure Federal Government Networks: Implement zero‑trust architectures, cloud transition, AI‑powered defenses, post‑quantum cryptography, and improved procurement to accelerate the modernization, defensibility, and resilience of federal systems, and remove barriers to entry for technology procurement.
  4. Secure Critical Infrastructure: Identify, prioritize, and harden critical sectors—such as energy, finance, telecommunications, water utilities, healthcare, and data centers—while securing supply chains and reducing reliance on adversary‑linked vendors.
  5. Sustain Superiority in Critical and Emerging Technologies: Secure U.S. innovation and intellectual property, including securing cryptocurrency and blockchain technologies and promoting adoption of post-quantum cryptography and secure quantum computing.  Promote U.S. leadership in AI and other new technological innovation by securing the “technology stack” to include data centers, promoting agentic AI to scale network defense, and leveraging cyber diplomacy.  
  6. Build Talent and Capacity: Develop a strong, accessible cyber workforce pipeline through education, training, and cross‑sector collaboration and by eliminating barriers that hinder alignment between industry, government, and academia.

Key Takeaways:  The Cyber Strategy envisions a robust private sector role in “identify[ing] and disrupt[ing]” adversary networks.  Although the Cyber Strategy does not authorize private sector actors to engage in offensive cyber operations against nation-state and criminal cyber threats, offensive cyber operations are a key component of the Administration’s overall strategy.  Such efforts are also likely to be further bolstered by the $1 billion appropriation for offensive cyber operations in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 

Companies operating in critical infrastructure sectors and technology, defense, and cybersecurity firms should therefore anticipate possible government outreach on efforts to tackle cyber threats and should proactively consider the legal and practical risks associated with engaging in such efforts, as well as how to protect against potential risks if others do so.  These include risks under:

  • The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), which contains broad provisions that, among other things, criminalize intentionally accessing a computer without authorization, and analogous state statutes;
  • The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), which prohibits unauthorized access to and disclosure of communications (in storage and in transit);
  • Rules applicable to government contractors; and
  • Risks under non-U.S. laws that may apply, depending on where the activity occurs.

In addition, the Strategy’s objective of promoting “common-sense” regulation could offer openings for private sector stakeholders to provide input on rulemaking processes that could impact the future of the cybersecurity regulatory landscape in the U.S., including the ongoing CIRCIA rulemaking.

Part II: Executive Order on Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes

Together with the Cyber Strategy, an Executive Order published on the same day directs the Attorney General and the Secretaries of War, Homeland Security, and State (in consultation with the Office of the National Cyber Director and the Assistant to the President and Homeland Security Advisor) to take steps to combat cybercrime and fraud schemes that victimize Americans, including schemes involving ransomware and malware, phishing, financial fraud, “sextortion” and other extortion, and impersonation.  The Order notes that such schemes are often perpetuated by Transnational Criminal Organizations (“TCOs”), which may enjoy the support of foreign regimes. 

In particular, the Order provides for the following:

  • Interagency Plan and Operational Coordination: The Order requires the submission of an action plan within 120 days “that identifies the TCOs responsible for scam centers and cybercrime and proposes solutions to prevent, disrupt, investigate, and dismantle these TCOs.”  The action plan should also provide for the creation of an operational cell within the National Coordination Center (“NCC”) that will coordinate the government’s efforts to address these threats.  The operational cell is to “involve[e] the private sector as appropriate” in efforts to detect, disrupt, dismantle, and deter cyber-enabled criminal activity.
  • Public-Private Engagement: The action plan must also describe how the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security, supported by the Secretary of War, will use “relevant technical capabilities, threat intelligence, and operational insights from commercial cybersecurity firms and other non-Federal entities . . . to enhance attribution, tracking, and disruption of malicious cyber actors and enabling infrastructure engaged in cybercrime, fraud, and predatory schemes.”
  • Enforcement Priorities: Federal prosecutors are directed to prioritize cyber-enabled fraud schemes, including scam centers and sextortion schemes.  This follows the Justice Department’s announcement of a Scam Center Strike Force last year.
  • Support for State and Local Partners: Federal agencies are directed to provide State, local, tribal, and territorial partners with training, resilience and technical assistance with a focus on hardening critical infrastructure.
  • Victims Restoration Program: Within 90 days, the Attorney General is directed to establish a “Victims Restoration Program” to provide “restoration or remission to victims of cyber-enabled fraud schemes from funds clawed back, forfeited, or seized” from cyber criminals that perpetuate such schemes.
  • International Engagement: The Secretary of State is instructed to, in coordination with the NCC, engage with foreign governments “to demand enforcement actions” against criminal organizations operating in their countries and cooperation with U.S. law enforcement.  In addition, the Secretary of State is to consider deploying other tools to impose consequences on nations that tolerate these criminal organizations, including by limiting foreign aid, imposing sanctions and trade penalties, restricting visas, and expelling foreign officials and diplomats.  

Key Takeaways: Taken together, the Order and Fact Sheet underscore the Administration’s continued focus on combating TCOs, including those engaged in cybercrime and fraud targeting American citizens.  While the Order mentions ransomware schemes, it also highlights sextortion schemes and scam centers as targets of the Administration’s proposed activities.  

In addition to the actions mentioned above, the Order follows several additional steps the Administration has taken to address these threats in the last year, including:

  • The publication of an advisory by the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to help financial institutions detect and disrupt financially motivated sextortion networks; and
  • The Treasury Department’s designation of Southeast Asian cyber scam networks.

As with the Cyber Strategy, the Order and Fact Sheet also envision significant private sector involvement in efforts to counter these threats, and private companies should expect continued government engagement on addressing these criminal cyber and cyber-enabled threats.

Photo of Ashden Fein Ashden Fein

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing…

Ashden Fein advises clients on cybersecurity and national security matters, including crisis management and incident response, risk management and governance, government and internal investigations, and regulatory compliance.

For cybersecurity matters, Mr. Fein counsels clients on preparing for and responding to cyber-based attacks, assessing security controls and practices for the protection of data and systems, developing and implementing cybersecurity risk management and governance programs, and complying with federal and state regulatory requirements. Mr. Fein frequently supports clients as the lead investigator and crisis manager for global cyber and data security incidents, including data breaches involving personal data, advanced persistent threats targeting intellectual property across industries, state-sponsored theft of sensitive U.S. government information, and destructive attacks.

Additionally, Mr. Fein assists clients from across industries with leading internal investigations and responding to government inquiries related to the U.S. national security. He also advises aerospace, defense, and intelligence contractors on security compliance under U.S. national security laws and regulations including, among others, the National Industrial Security Program (NISPOM), U.S. government cybersecurity regulations, and requirements related to supply chain security.

Before joining Covington, Mr. Fein served on active duty in the U.S. Army as a Military Intelligence officer and prosecutor specializing in cybercrime and national security investigations and prosecutions — to include serving as the lead trial lawyer in the prosecution of Private Chelsea (Bradley) Manning for the unlawful disclosure of classified information to Wikileaks.

Mr. Fein currently serves as a Judge Advocate in the U.S. Army Reserve.

Read more about Ashden Fein
Show more Show less
Photo of Caleb Skeath Caleb Skeath

Caleb Skeath advises clients on a broad range of privacy and data security issues, including regulatory inquiries from the Federal Trade Commission, data breach notification obligations, compliance with consumer protection laws, and state and federal laws regarding educational and financial privacy.

Read more about Caleb Skeath
Susan B. Cassidy

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government…

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government contractors and represents her clients before the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Inspectors General (IG), and the Department of Justice with regard to those investigations.  From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Cassidy served as in-house counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation, one of the world’s largest defense contractors, supporting both defense and intelligence programs. Previously, Ms. Cassidy held an in-house position with Motorola Inc., leading a team of lawyers supporting sales of commercial communications products and services to US government defense and civilian agencies. Prior to going in-house, Ms. Cassidy was a litigation and government contracts partner in an international law firm headquartered in Washington, DC.

Read more about Susan B. Cassidy
Show more Show less
Photo of Ryan Burnette Ryan Burnette

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the…

Ryan Burnette advises clients on a range of issues related to government contracting. Mr. Burnette has particular experience with helping companies navigate mergers and acquisitions, FAR and DFARS compliance issues, public policy matters, government investigations, and issues involving government cost accounting and the Cost Accounting Standards.  Prior to joining Covington, Mr. Burnette served in the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Executive Office of the President, where he worked on government-wide contracting regulations and administrative actions affecting more than $400 billion dollars’ worth of goods and services each year.

Read more about Ryan Burnette
Show more Show less
Photo of Alexandra Cooper-Ponte Alexandra Cooper-Ponte

Alexandra (Ali) Cooper-Ponte’s practice focuses on regulatory, enforcement, litigation, and investigations matters involving emerging technologies and national security. She advises clients on compliance with surveillance, cybersecurity, and data privacy laws and on trust and safety issues.

Prior to re-joining the firm, she clerked…

Alexandra (Ali) Cooper-Ponte’s practice focuses on regulatory, enforcement, litigation, and investigations matters involving emerging technologies and national security. She advises clients on compliance with surveillance, cybersecurity, and data privacy laws and on trust and safety issues.

Prior to re-joining the firm, she clerked for Judge José A. Cabranes, United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. She also worked on electronic surveillance and law enforcement access issues at a large technology company prior to law school.

Read more about Alexandra Cooper-Ponte
Show more Show less
Matthew Harden

Matthew Harden is a litigation associate in the firm’s New York office and advises on a broad range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and national security matters, including cybersecurity incident response, cybersecurity and privacy compliance obligations, internal investigations, and regulatory inquiries.

Read more about Matthew Harden
Photo of Shayan Karbassi Shayan Karbassi

Shayan Karbassi is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the firm’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and White Collar and Investigations Practice Groups. Shayan advises clients on a range of cybersecurity and national security matters. He also…

Shayan Karbassi is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the firm’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity and White Collar and Investigations Practice Groups. Shayan advises clients on a range of cybersecurity and national security matters. He also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Read more about Shayan Karbassi
Show more Show less
Photo of Grace Howard Grace Howard

Grace Howard is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and government contracts issues including cyber and data security incident response and preparedness, regulatory compliance, and internal investigations including matters…

Grace Howard is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She represents and advises clients on a range of cybersecurity, data privacy, and government contracts issues including cyber and data security incident response and preparedness, regulatory compliance, and internal investigations including matters involving allegations of noncompliance with U.S. government cybersecurity regulations and fraud under the False Claims Act.

Prior to joining the firm, Grace served in the United States Navy as a Surface Warfare Officer and currently serves in the U.S. Navy Reserve.

Read more about Grace Howard
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Inside Privacy
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo