Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Colorado Rewrites Its AI Law Before It Takes Effect

By Kathryn Rattigan on May 28, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Colorado has now significantly revised its AI governance framework before the law ever takes effect. SB 26-189, approved by Governor Jared Polis on May 14, 2026, repeals and reenacts key portions of the Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA) and reframes the law around “automated decision-making technology” (ADMT) used to materially influence consequential decisions in areas such as employment, housing, financial and lending services, insurance, health care, education, and essential government services. 

The revised law is narrower and more operational than the original version. Rather than treating every AI-adjacent business tool as a high-risk system, SB 26-189 focuses on covered ADMTs that process personal data and generate outputs such as predictions, recommendations, classifications, rankings, or scores that materially influence consequential decisions. It also excludes several low-risk or routine uses, including certain administrative, cybersecurity, fraud prevention, anti-money laundering, sanctions compliance, advertising, marketing, search, content moderation, and customer-service functions that do not materially influence covered decisions. 

For companies, the practical takeaway is that Colorado has not abandoned AI regulation, but it has moved toward a more targeted compliance model. Deployers must provide clear notice before using covered ADMTs in consequential decisions, provide post-adverse outcome information within 30 days, maintain compliance records for at least three years, and offer correction and meaningful human review rights in certain circumstances. While the original law was set to take effect next month, the amended law now takes effect on January 1, 2027, and applies to consequential decisions made on or after that date, gives the Colorado Attorney General exclusive enforcement authority, includes a conditional 60-day cure period, and confirms that the statute does not create a new private right of action. To review the amended law, click here

Photo of Kathryn Rattigan Kathryn Rattigan

Kathryn Rattigan is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Data Privacy and Security Team. She concentrates her practice on privacy and security compliance under both state and federal regulations and advising clients on website and mobile app privacy and…

Kathryn Rattigan is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Data Privacy and Security Team. She concentrates her practice on privacy and security compliance under both state and federal regulations and advising clients on website and mobile app privacy and security compliance. Kathryn helps clients review, revise and implement necessary policies and procedures under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). She also provides clients with the information needed to effectively and efficiently handle potential and confirmed data breaches while providing insight into federal regulations and requirements for notification and an assessment under state breach notification laws. Prior to joining the firm, Kathryn was an associate at Nixon Peabody. She earned her J.D., cum laude, from Roger Williams University School of Law and her B.A., magna cum laude, from Stonehill College. She is admitted to practice law in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Read her full rc.com bio here.

Read more about Kathryn Rattigan
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo