This blog previously covered the Federal Circuit’s decision in Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, which addressed bid protest jurisdiction and standing at the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”), and seemed to potentially open the door to a new category of protests. Now, in an en banc ruling, the Federal Circuit vacated that decision and reached a different conclusion on bid protest standing. The Federal Circuit left the jurisdictional questions unresolved, but even if future decisions construe COFC’s jurisdiction broadly, the Federal Circuit’s decision on standing will likely limit the universe of new protests that might otherwise result from such a broad construction of jurisdiction.
About
Andrew Guy is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Government Contracts practice group.
Latest Post
More Posts
Timeline of Key Developments Related to Recent Executive Actions: April Edition
Percipient.ai, Inc. v. U.S.: Government Requests Reconsideration of Federal Circuit’s Decision on Bid Protest Jurisdiction and Standing
Percipient.ai, Inc. v. U.S.: Matters of Contract Administration Can Be Fair Game For COFC Protests, Even When They Involve a Task Order
About
Andrew Guy is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Government Contracts practice group.
Firm/Org