When using any technology — including AI — a lawyer “must independently review, verify, and exercise professional judgment regarding any output generated by the technology that is used in connection with representing a client.” That language appears in a new comment to Rule 1.1 on competence proposed by the State Bar of California’s Standing Committee
Latest Post
More Posts
Practice Management Platform Clio To Discontinue Its Longtime Integration with Payments Processor LawPay
Gavel Launches Web-Based AI Contract Platform, Expanding ‘Gavel Exec’ Beyond Its Word Add-In
Questel Launches QaECTER, a New AI Model Claiming State-of-the-Art Performance in Patent Search
Clio Work, Clio’s AI Workspace, Is Now Available To Solo and Smaller Law Firms As A Standalone Product
LexisNexis and Luminance Announce Partnership to Embed Protégé Inside Luminance’s Contract Platform
A Public Service Announcement: Legal Tech Companies, Here Are Your Celebrity Endorsers
Centerbase Launches AI-Powered Business Intelligence Tool That Gives Firms Citation-Backed Answers from Their Own Data
LawNext Podcast: Learned Hand’s Shlomo Klapper on Why Courts Are the Next Frontier for Legal AI
Josef Launches ‘Rapid Ingestion Engine,’ Using AI To Turn Messy Business Inputs Into Structured Legal Workflows
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org