Keypoint: The California legislature enters into the final week of its session with many bills still under consideration.
We are currently tracking thirteen privacy and AI-related bills that previously crossed chambers prior to the legislative deadline. With the California legislature closing on August 31, we will be providing weekly updates on the progress of these
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently issued a unanimous Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry targeting the use of AI-related technologies for communicating with consumers.1 In the proposed rule, the FCC seeks to impose a broad definition for AI technologies subject to the requirements of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Companies
In Greek mythology, Sisyphus was punished by Hades for cheating death (twice) by forcing him to roll an immense boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down every time it neared the top. AI stakeholders know the feeling. Attempting to keep pace with the downpour of artificial intelligence-related regulation, guidance, rules and
A recent Forbes article summarizes a potentially problematic aspect of AI which highlights the importance of governance and the quality of data when training AI models. It is called “model collapse.” It turns out that over time, when AI models use data that earlier AI models created (rather than data created by humans), something is
@media screen and (max-width: 1023px){section[data-id=”block_c8a6d5987c5fe80cbb0818851442b828″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1365px){section[data-id=”block_c8a6d5987c5fe80cbb0818851442b828″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1366px){section[data-id=”block_c8a6d5987c5fe80cbb0818851442b828″]{ }}
In 2024, many organisations have been eager to look at how they can use the data they hold to debut or build on their artificial intelligence (AI) programme. Many are looking to use that data to train AI models, or fine-tune third-party models. That data will almost certainly include personal data, meaning that the processing
Keypoint: Although not nearly as far-reaching as the Colorado AI Act, the Illinois law adds to the growing patchwork of state laws that regulate artificial intelligence.
On August 9, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed HB 3773 into law. The bill, which goes into effect January 1, 2026, amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to regulate
While the craze over generative AI, ChatGPT, and the fear of employees in the professions landing on breadlines in the imminent future may have subsided a bit, many concerns remain about how best to use and manage AI. Of course, these concerns are not specific to Fortune 500 companies.
A recent story in CIODive reports
Keypoint: Companies onboarding AI products and services need to understand the potential risks associated with these products and implement contractual provisions to manage them.
With the rapid emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services, companies using these products and services need to negotiate contractual provisions that adequately address the unique issues they present. However,
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) continues its regulatory focus on Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the communications world, with the issuance of new proposed regulations designed to protect consumers from harmful AI-generated communications, targeting robocalls, automated texting, and political advertising.
The FCC has formally moved forward with a combined Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and