Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment | Decided March 25, 2026
On March 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark decision that will reshape not only how copyright law applies to the internet for years to come, but could impact other areas of intellectual property law as well. In Cox Communications, Inc. v.
By: Alan Fong, Chief Technology Officer, CARET
Today we’re launching not just new features, but a new way of delivering them.
The Spring 2026 Seasonal Launch is our biggest product launch yet, with updates across accounting, analytics, conflict checks, billing, and performance — strengthening the system firms depend on every day. It’s the first in a series
On March 13, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order titled “Promoting Access to Mortgage Credit,” directing federal financial regulators to consider a broad set of revisions to the mortgage regulatory framework. The order is the most comprehensive signal to date that the administration intends to revisit core elements of the post-Dodd-Frank compliance
The DJ has LA Superior Court chatbot CourtHelp wins Justice Chin innovation award — The court won the 2026 Justice Chin Technology Innovation Award for its AI chatbot, which improved access by guiding users to court information and services efficiently online.
Although today’s case summary isn’t related to local government issues, it is an important reminder to be careful in relying on AI (artificial intelligence) for legal work, particularly in filings with the court.In Dec v. Markwayne Mullin, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a challenge by a Polish citizen who was denied a
“A larger context window can create the feeling that a cognitive problem has been solved, when sometimes all that has happened is that disorder has become harder to notice.”I was in Silicon Valley recently for the initial meeting of the University of Michigan Law School AI Advisory Council. With a little free time around that
Lawyers are under pressure to modernize the way they deliver legal services without sacrificing the trust, judgment, and professionalism that define the profession. Clients expect clearer communication, more transparency around costs, and a smoother experience at every step of the matter. At the same time, artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies are reshaping how legal
The State Bar of Texas is hosting a free webinar for attorneys interested in learning about the use of artificial intelligence in the practice of law. The event, titled “Ask a Human: A Q&A Session on AI,” will take place April 15 from 3 to 4 p.m. CDT and requires advanced registration. To sign up, visit texasbarpractice.com and click the “Register Now” button at the top of the page. All attorneys and other legal professionals are welcome —
On March 20, 2026, the White House released its National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence (“Framework”), outlining legislative recommendations for Congress to establish a unified federal approach to AI regulation. The Framework builds on prior executive actions, including the December 2025 Executive Order (the “Executive Order”) and the Trump administration’s “America’s AI Action Plan,” and it proposes that Congress adopt legislation broadly preempting state AI laws deemed to impose “undue burdens.” This alert summarizes the Framework’s key provisions, analyzes their potential impact on state laws, and highlights considerations for healthcare and life sciences stakeholders navigating the evolving regulatory landscape. While the Framework does not itself change the current legal status of the Executive Order, it signals increased policy focus and may prompt further agency action.
Earnout remedies are not limited to damages. In Fortis Advisors v. Krafton, the Delaware Court of Chancery awarded specific performance to reinstate a target company’s CEO and extend the earnout by the time that elapsed between the CEO’s wrongful, ChatGPT-informed termination and his restoration. The decision also highlights a growing business risk: executives’ direct
