In our previous blog posts here and here, we reported on the Hong Kong government’s efforts to update the Copyright Ordinance to align with the latest technological developments, especially in relation to artificial intelligence. This month, the government released a further public consultation to update the Registered Designs Ordinance (RDO) in view of global
The Brand Protection Blog
Covering the legal developments impacting your brands
Blog Authors
Latest from The Brand Protection Blog
The Australian IP Report 2025: Staying ahead of the pack
This article was co-authored with Alyson Poole, with thanks to Jerome Messiha.
Overview
IP Australia released the Australian IP Report 2025 (IP Report), providing the latest IP trends, statistics and policy developments across Australia. In this article we explore the trends and developments across key industries including consumer markets, energy and transport, pharmaceuticals and…
Are You Ready for an AI Compliance Check?
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong conducted compliance checks on 60 local organizations across a wide range of sectors to study their use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact on personal data privacy, with the aim to monitor compliance with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (“PDPO”) in…
Court Halts Anthropic’s Historic AI Copyright Settlement
Judge William Alsup expressed broad concerns about a proposed $1.5 billion settlement deal between Anthropic PBC and a number of author-plaintiffs, questioning whether the agreement adequately protects class members and Anthropic. At a September 8 preliminary hearing, Judge Alsup denied the parties’ motion for approval without prejudice, later issuing an order postponing approval until more…
Hong Kong Government takes legislative steps to encourage artificial intelligence development
In August 2024, we reported on the Hong Kong Government’s two-month public consultation on potential revisions to the Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528) (“CO”) in response to developments in generative artificial intelligence (“AI”). The public consultation was completed on 8 September 2024.
On 18 February 2025, the Government submitted a discussion paper (“Paper”) to the Legislative…
Turning an AI image into reality, does that infringe in China?
On 27th November 2023, the Beijing Internet Court upheld that an AI generated work can be protected by copyright if the work reflects an author’s choice of expression and has originality (see our earlier blog post here). Almost a year later, on 18th October 2024, we now have another decision from the Changshu People’s…
Intellectual property and the digital world
The digital economy is built around speed, simplicity and more efficient ways of doing things. Data security and privacy is expected but is often negotiable as consumers are enticed to trade private information for efficiency or more attractive offers. In workplaces information sharing and collaboration is more fluid than ever before, and creativity is increasingly…
The unavoidable trajectory – Hong Kong considers interplay between copyright and artificial intelligence
On 8 July 2024, the Hong Kong government launched a two-month public consultation on potential revisions to the Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528) in view of the rapid developments in artificial intelligence (“AI”), especially generative AI. The 52-page consultation paper titled “Copyright and Artificial Intelligence” (the “Paper”) addresses the following issues relating to generative AI:
- How
…
PRC hands down first ruling on AI voice infringement
Over the past few years, the PRC courts have witnessed a significant increase in AI-related disputes (see our previous newsletters here and here). The Beijing Internet Court’s recent decision on an AI-generated voice case further enriches the jurisprudence in this dynamic field. On 23 April 2024, the Beijing Internet Court handed down its first…
Who is liable when an artificial intelligence system infringes copyright – a missed opportunity by the PRC Court
In our previous newsletter here, we reported a decision from the Beijing Internet Court ruling that the copyright of a portrait generated by an artificial intelligence (“AI”) program is owned by the user who “controlled meticulously” the parameters for creating the image. This time, the Guangzhou Internet court had to tackle a different intellectual…