Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

DOJ Addresses Pricing Technologies

By Stephen C. Piepgrass, Michael Yaghi & Abby Hylton on July 3, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a recent interview, Jonathan Kanter, the U.S. Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, shared his thoughts on the use of technology in setting and advertising prices.

Dynamic Pricing

One recent pricing trend involves dynamic pricing, where businesses can use technology to rapidly change prices based on real-time market conditions. Companies are announcing plans to use digital screens to display prices in-store, which would enable use of dynamic pricing. For example, Wendy’s recently announced that it will test dynamic pricing. It reassured customers that it would not use surge pricing to raise prices during busy periods, but instead emphasized that the technology would benefit customers by offering lower prices during slower times of day. Retail stores have also considered replacing price stickers with digital screens in order to maximize efficiency and save employee time. Of course, the switch to digital does not necessarily mean they intend to use dynamic pricing in the future, but the potential for this use has raised concerns among the public and regulators alike.

With these trends in mind, Kanter expressed concern about businesses’ ability to rapidly change prices, particularly if companies begin to set different prices for individual customers. He alleged that the ability to set prices on a personal customer level could lead to “greater extraction of monopoly power than probably ever seen in history.”

Use of AI in Setting Prices

Another trend involves businesses using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to suggest or determine prices. Kanter cautioned against use of these technologies to the extent they lead to price fixing. He clarified that using AI technology to fix prices carries the same consequences as colluding on prices with another human. Indeed, he noted using AI “should concern us more because it’s much easier to price-fix when you’re outsourcing it to an algorithm.”

Why It Matters

Companies are considering new ways to incorporate technological solutions into their business, and this includes technology that informs decisions to set prices and allows companies to easily change prices based on that information. The interview with Kanter, however, indicates that regulators are closely following these developments. Looking ahead, companies that consider implementing these technologies should ensure that their use complies with applicable state and federal law, including antitrust law.


More on Artificial Intelligence + the Future of Law.

Photo of Stephen C. Piepgrass Stephen C. Piepgrass

Stephen specializes in state Attorneys General investigations and other government entities, as well as litigation.

Read more about Stephen C. PiepgrassStephen C.'s Linkedin Profile
Photo of Michael Yaghi Michael Yaghi

Michael Yaghi handles high-profile state attorneys general, FTC, and CFPB investigations by advising clients through these complex government inquiries. He assists clients through the entire life cycle of investigations, from regulatory enforcement through formal litigation.

Read more about Michael Yaghi
Photo of Abby Hylton Abby Hylton

Abby is an associate in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement practice. She previously served as a summer associate at the firm in 2021.

Read more about Abby Hylton
  • Posted in:
    Civil Litigation, Corporate Compliance
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo