Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Illinois the Latest State to Enact Legislation Regulating Employers’ Use of AI

By Steven J. Pearlman, Jonathan Slowik & Edward Young on August 14, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 9, 2024, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed into law HB3773, a bill amending the Illinois Human Rights Act to address employers’ use of artificial intelligence (AI).  The amendment clarifies that it is a civil rights violation to use AI that has the effect of discriminating on the basis of protected classes under Illinois law, or to “use zip codes as a proxy for protected classes.”  775 ILCS 5/2-101(L)(1).  In doing so, Illinois becomes one of the first states to expressly ban the use of zip codes as a proxy.

In addition, the amendment also requires employees to “provide notice” to employees when they use AI for purposes of “recruitment, hiring, promotion, renewal of employment, selection for training or apprenticeship, discharge, discipline, tenure, or the terms privileges, or conditions of employment.”  Id. 5/2-101(L)(2).  Forthcoming regulations should define the contours of this obligation, as the amendment empowers the Illinois Department of Human Rights to adopt “rules on the circumstances and conditions that require notice, the time period for providing notice, and the means for providing notice.”  Id.

In enacting HB3773, Illinois become the second state, after Colorado, to require disclosures to employees about the use of AI in employment decisions (although measures have also been introduced in several other states), but it stops short of some of the more burdensome aspects of the Colorado statute.  Colorado requires disclosures to employees and applicants before using AI as a “substantial factor” in an employment decision, and after using AI as a “substantial factor” in an adverse decision.  It also requires employers to let employees and applicants correct any inaccurate data that was processed in making an adverse decision and appeal an adverse decision (with human review if technically feasible).  And it requires regular impact assessment and bias audits to identify and mitigate risks of algorithmic discrimination.  Illinois’s new statute has none of these features. As lawmakers and regulators continue to grapple with the transformative nature of AI in the workplace, Illinois will not be the last state to enact new laws regulating employers’ use of AI.  We will continue to monitor these developments.

Photo of Steven J. Pearlman Steven J. Pearlman

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract…

Steven J. Pearlman is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group. Steven’s practice focuses on defending complex employment litigation involving claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation; wage-and-hour laws; breach of employment contract; and restrictive covenants (e.g., non-competition agreements). Steven is also at the forefront of defending whistleblower retaliation claims, and routinely conducts investigations arising from whistleblower reports. He has successfully tried cases to verdict in Illinois, Florida and California, and defended what is reported to be the largest Illinois-only class action in the history of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He has also testified in defense of his investigations in federal court.

Read more about Steven J. Pearlman
Show more Show less
Photo of Jonathan Slowik Jonathan Slowik

Jonathan Slowik is a special counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Counseling Group.

Read more about Jonathan Slowik
Photo of Edward Young Edward Young

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including…

Edward “Eddie” C. Young is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Firm’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation and the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Groups.

Eddie’s practice focuses on defending companies in all aspects of employment litigation, including claims of discrimination, harassment and retaliation, breach of restrictive covenants (e.g., noncompetition and nonsolicitation), and whistleblower retaliation. He has handled such cases before state and federal courts throughout the country, as well as before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Illinois Department of Human Rights, the American Arbitration Association and the Department of Labor.

Read more about Edward Young
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Law and the Workplace
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo