Skip to content

Editor’s Note: OpenAI’s restructuring into a for-profit public benefit corporation marks a critical juncture for the company and its future in artificial intelligence. Initially founded as a nonprofit to ensure AI benefits humanity, OpenAI now shifts towards a model that balances profitability with societal impact. This move, sparked by over $13 billion in investments and internal leadership transitions, mirrors the strategies of competitors like Anthropic and xAI. For cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery professionals, this structural change signals an evolving landscape where AI’s development is increasingly influenced by investor expectations, corporate governance, and competitive pressures.

Industry News – Artificial Intelligence Beat

OpenAI’s For-Profit Shift: Restructuring and Executive Movements Reshape AI Landscape

ComplexDiscovery Staff

OpenAI, the prominent AI research organization initially founded as a non-profit, is undergoing significant structural changes to become a for-profit public benefit corporation. This shift, which includes awarding CEO Sam Altman a seven percent equity stake, has sparked conversations and speculations within the tech and business communities. Initially, OpenAI was set up in 2015 as a nonprofit with a mission to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. However, in 2019, it created a “capped profit” subsidiary, OpenAI LP, allowing it to secure over $13 billion in investments from Microsoft. The decision to restructure as a for-profit entity aligns OpenAI with rivals like Anthropic and Elon Musk’s xAI, which also operate as public benefit corporations.

Recent reports from Bloomberg and Reuters suggest that this restructuring aims to make OpenAI more attractive for further investments. It comes amidst a period of internal turmoil within the company, highlighted by the sudden resignation of CTO Mira Murati and other top executives like Chief Research Officer Bob McGrew and Barrett Zoph. Mira Murati’s departure especially surprised employees, as indicated by internal communications filled with shock and inquiries.

This potential restructuring does not only pivot OpenAI’s operational strategy but also its governance, as it will no longer be controlled by a non-profit board. Instead, shareholders will elect the board members, giving them significant influence over the company’s direction. Anat Alon-Beck, a corporate law expert from Case Western Reserve University’s School of Law, noted that the new structure could give shareholders more power over decision-making, especially if they are controlling shareholders, which Sam Altman could become.

Under the new framework, OpenAI’s tax status is likely to change as it becomes subject to corporate taxes, losing the benefits enjoyed as a non-profit. Delaware’s law stipulates that public benefit corporations must report to shareholders biennially on their progress in positively impacting society, a requirement acknowledged by business law professor Eric Chaffee as he noted that the emphasis will now be on making a profit, and any tax benefits that it enjoyed as a result of its nonprofit status will go away. This sentiment is echoed by an OpenAI spokesperson who affirmed, “We remain focused on building AI that benefits everyone, and we’re working with our board to ensure that we’re best positioned to succeed in our mission. The non-profit is core to our mission and will continue to exist.”

The transition to a public benefit corporation is partially driven by investors’ desires for a more straightforward exit strategy, allowing them to cash out and see substantial returns. Currently discussing a $6.5 billion financing round, OpenAI could see its valuation soar to $150 billion, with Altman’s seven percent stake potentially making him $10.5 billion wealthier. This development is part of broader funding dynamics, where shareholders seek governance changes or otherwise have the option to request their money back.

Furthermore, unlike before, there would be no cap on profits under the public benefit corporation structure. This change is deemed necessary to align with stakeholder interests fully, ensuring substantial financial returns. It marks a significant shift from the original OpenAI ethos but aligns with the evolving landscape of AI startups seeking to balance societal impact and profitability.

Amidst all these changes, other executives’ movements have also created ripples within OpenAI. Co-founder John Schulman recently left for a role at Anthropic, another AI startup. On the leadership realignment front, six current OpenAI executives will now report directly to Altman, who has acknowledged the abruptness of these transitions by highlighting that leadership changes are a natural part of companies, especially companies that grow so quickly and are so demanding.

The organizational overhaul at OpenAI underscores the balancing act between maintaining the mission of benefiting humanity while meeting the financial expectations of investors. As the company continues finalizing its restructuring and securing significant investments, the tech world is keenly observing how these shifts will position OpenAI in the broader AI landscape.

News Sources


Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

The post OpenAI’s For-Profit Shift: Restructuring and Executive Movements Reshape AI Landscape appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.

Photo of Alan N. Sutin Alan N. Sutin

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy and cybersecurity matters, he advises clients in connection with transactions involving the development, acquisition, disposition and commercial exploitation of intellectual property with an emphasis on technology-related products and services, and counsels companies on a wide range of issues relating to privacy and cybersecurity. Alan holds the CIPP/US certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Alan also represents a wide variety of companies in connection with IT and business process outsourcing arrangements, strategic alliance agreements, commercial joint ventures and licensing matters. He has particular experience in Internet and electronic commerce issues and has been involved in many of the major policy issues surrounding the commercial development of the Internet. Alan has advised foreign governments and multinational corporations in connection with these issues and is a frequent speaker at major industry conferences and events around the world.