Skip to content

Editor’s Note: AI systems now make critical decisions that affect millions of lives, from healthcare to finance, raising urgent concerns about bias, security, and ethical integrity. The European Union’s AI Act directly addresses these challenges, imposing strict compliance standards for AI developers. This article examines LatticeFlow’s LLM Checker, a tool designed to help developers ensure their models meet the requirements of the EU AI Act. For professionals in cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery, staying updated on such compliance tools is crucial as AI regulations become increasingly essential to responsible innovation.

Industry News – Artificial Intelligence Beat

Evaluating AI Compliance: The LatticeFlow LLM Checker and the EU AI Act

ComplexDiscovery Staff

Imagine a world where AI systems are responsible for critical decisions affecting millions—whether it’s diagnosing health conditions or determining loan approvals. Now, imagine the chaos if these systems were biased, insecure, or ethically compromised. Unfortunately, this isn’t a far-off dystopian scenario; it’s a genuine concern driving the latest regulatory shifts in artificial intelligence governance.

As AI technology rapidly advances, regulators are racing to catch up. The European Union’s AI Act is a prime example of this effort. Designed to ensure the safety, resilience, and ethical use of AI, the Act sets stringent requirements for compliance, particularly for generative AI models from industry giants like OpenAI and Meta. The stakes are high, with potential fines reaching 35 million euros or 7% of a company’s global annual revenue.

In response to these regulatory demands, Zurich-based startup LatticeFlow has introduced the LLM Checker—an innovative tool designed to help developers evaluate whether their AI models comply with the EU AI Act. This tool gives developers a structured approach to navigating the complex world of AI regulations, reducing the risk of non-compliance and ensuring more secure, fair, and transparent AI.

The LatticeFlow LLM Checker: A Compliance Evaluation Tool

Backed by research from leading institutions like ETH Zurich and Bulgaria’s Institute for Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Technology (INSAIT), LatticeFlow’s LLM Checker assesses AI models against the EU’s strict benchmarks. It evaluates AI models in 27 categories, such as cybersecurity resilience, bias in outputs, toxic language generation, and common-sense reasoning.

Scoring System and Key Findings

The LLM Checker uses a scoring scale from 0 (no compliance) to 1 (full compliance), with scores below 0.75 indicating potential risks that require attention to meet regulatory standards. Despite generally high scores for models from companies like OpenAI and Meta, significant gaps were identified:

  • Discriminatory Outputs: OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 Turbo scored 0.46, while Alibaba’s Qwen1.5 72B Chat scored lower at 0.37, reflecting ongoing issues with bias in race and gender.
  • Cybersecurity Resilience: Meta’s Llama 2 13B Chat model scored 0.42 in “prompt hijacking” tests, exposing vulnerabilities to attacks that could extract sensitive data. Similarly, the model from French startup Mistral registered a concerning score of 0.38.

These findings emphasize the urgent need for AI developers to address shortcomings in areas such as cybersecurity and bias, ensuring their models align with regulatory expectations.

Real-World Consequences of AI Failures

The risks of non-compliant AI systems are far from theoretical. For instance, we’ve already seen AI algorithms come under scrutiny for bias in areas like hiring, where biased AI models led to gender discrimination in job recommendations. Similarly, in the U.S., flawed AI systems have been used in legal settings, potentially leading to unfair sentencing decisions. Such real-world failures demonstrate why compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act is not just a box-ticking exercise—it’s essential to avoid severe social and financial consequences.

Implications for AI Developers

The LLM Checker gives AI developers a clear path to EU AI Act compliance. By systematically assessing their models across key categories, developers can proactively identify and address potential weaknesses before they result in regulatory violations. Achieving compliance not only helps avoid hefty fines but also improves the reliability and trustworthiness of AI technologies.

Petar Tsankov, CEO of LatticeFlow, noted, “The EU is still refining all the compliance benchmarks, but we can already see gaps in the models.” The freely available tool provides developers with a self-assessment resource, empowering them to refine their models early in the development cycle.

Regulatory Landscape and Future Outlook

The European Commission has already acknowledged the importance of the LLM Checker. Thomas Regnier, a spokesperson for the Commission, described it as “a first step” in translating the AI Act’s abstract principles into tangible technical requirements.

The AI Act is set to be fully enforced by 2025, bringing with it strict standards on transparency, fairness, and data privacy. As discussions around specific compliance details continue, building AI systems that align with these values will be essential. For developers, adopting tools like the LLM Checker is a proactive way to ensure their models meet these evolving requirements.

Going Forward Responsibly

As we revisit the scenario at the beginning of this article, the LatticeFlow LLM Checker stands out as a vital safeguard against the risks posed by unchecked AI systems. By offering a comprehensive evaluation framework, the tool ensures that AI models meet rigorous standards, thereby fostering responsible innovation.

AI failures have already caused significant social and legal issues, from biased hiring algorithms to privacy breaches in consumer data. Tools like the LLM Checker not only reveal critical areas in need of improvement but also guide developers toward creating fair, secure, and compliant AI systems. This approach is particularly crucial as AI increasingly affects industries ranging from legal to corporate and public sectors.

For developers, leveraging tools like the LLM Checker provides a proactive approach to compliance, ensuring that their technologies meet high standards while fostering responsible, ethical innovation. As regulatory pressures mount, such tools are indispensable for navigating the intersection of technological advancement and legal governance.

The future is already here—AI is making life-altering decisions every day. With tools like the LatticeFlow LLM Checker, we have the means to ensure this future is one of ethical, secure, and transparent AI, minimizing the risks of chaos while unlocking the immense potential of this transformative technology.

News Sources


Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

The post Evaluating AI Compliance: The LatticeFlow LLM Checker and the EU AI Act appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.

Photo of Alan N. Sutin Alan N. Sutin

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy and cybersecurity matters, he advises clients in connection with transactions involving the development, acquisition, disposition and commercial exploitation of intellectual property with an emphasis on technology-related products and services, and counsels companies on a wide range of issues relating to privacy and cybersecurity. Alan holds the CIPP/US certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Alan also represents a wide variety of companies in connection with IT and business process outsourcing arrangements, strategic alliance agreements, commercial joint ventures and licensing matters. He has particular experience in Internet and electronic commerce issues and has been involved in many of the major policy issues surrounding the commercial development of the Internet. Alan has advised foreign governments and multinational corporations in connection with these issues and is a frequent speaker at major industry conferences and events around the world.