A Minnesota court threw out an expert statement because it was generated by AI and included fake references. The case involved a Minnesota Stat. § 609.771 that bans people from using deepfake media to influence elections.
Jeff Hancock, a misinformation specialist and a Stanford University communication professor, used fake article citations generated by AI to support the state’s arguments. Hancock, subsequently admitted that his declaration inadvertently included citations to two non-existent academic articles, and incorrectly cited the authors of a third article. In his defense, Hancock told Judge Provinzino that he used ChatGPT-4, while drafting his declaration and could not explain precisely how these AI-hallucinated citations got into his declaration.
As Judge Provinzino said:
“The irony. Professor Hancock, a credentialed expert on the dangers of AI and misinformation, has fallen victim to the siren call of relying too heavily on AI—in a case that revolves around the dangers of AI, no less.”
Blaming it on the AI may be this decade’s excuse replacing the dog ate my homework.
Sources:
- Judge Blasts Stanford AI Expert’s Credibility Over Fake, AI-Created Sources
- Judge rebukes Minnesota over AI errors in ‘deepfakes’ lawsuit
- Order Excluding Expert Testimony
- Maryke Sher-Lun LinkedIn Post