Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Thomson Reuters Enter. Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc.

By publisher-ailegalinsights.lexblogplatformfour.com on February 19, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 11, 2025, the U.S. district court for the District of Delaware revised its own 2023 opinion and found on summary judgment that ROSS Intelligence’s (“Ross”) use of certain Westlaw “headnotes” to develop Ross’s AI-powered legal research tool constituted copyright infringement and not fair use. The court granted most of copyright owner Thomson Reuters’ motion for partial summary judgment on direct copyright infringement, granted Thomson Reuters’ motion for partial summary judgment on fair use, and denied Ross’s motion for summary judgment on fair use. In evaluating the fair use factors, the court emphasized that “Ross’s AI is not generative AI (AI that writes new content itself).”

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Incontestable Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo