Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Six State Attorney Generals Object to Proposed AI Enforcement Moratorium

By Odia Kagan on June 25, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
U.S. Capitol
The U.S. Capitol

The Attorney Generals of California, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, Oregon and Vermont wrote a letter June 23, 2025 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, objecting to a proposed AI enforcement moratorium that is in the One Big Beautiful Bill.

The key arguments against the ban are:

  • States have played a leading role in developing strong privacy and technology protections.
  • Existing state privacy laws already address substantial privacy harms posed by AI.
  • Artificial intelligence systems pose immediate and tangible privacy risks that cannot wait a decade for federal action.
  • The often-cited concerns about a patchwork of state laws are overstated, as states regularly work together and build upon one another’s legislative frameworks, creating coherent approaches that respect both innovation and consumer protection.
  • Restricting state action is also not consistent with established federal privacy law frameworks.
  • The moratorium would create a regulatory vacuum that benefits AI developers at the expense of privacy rights.

Read the letter here.

  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Privacy Compliance & Data Security
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo