Skip to content

Editor’s Note: Operational confidence across the eDiscovery industry is high—but is it grounded in financial clarity? This third installment of our four-part series on the 2H 2025 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey explores a striking contradiction: while senior leaders report optimism, many remain in the dark about core financial indicators like Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) and Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR). The resulting “Visibility Gap” raises red flags for strategic decision-making, financial risk management, and operational resilience. For professionals in cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery, these blind spots aren’t just data issues—they’re potential liabilities. This article sheds light on the micro-economic realities behind the industry’s macro-level confidence.

Industry Research

The Visibility Gap: Operational Metrics and Financial Health in the 2H 2025 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey

ComplexDiscovery Staff

While the headline numbers of the 2H 2025 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey depict an industry brimming with optimism, a deeper dive into the operational metrics reveals a more complex reality. Business confidence is high, and revenue outlooks are positive. Yet, the specific financial levers that drive day-to-day health—Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) and Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR)—are shrouded in a surprising degree of opacity. This “Visibility Gap” suggests that while the industry feels good about the macro environment, a significant portion of its professionals may be flying blind regarding the micro-economic factors that sustain their organizations.

Setting the Stage: A Leadership View with Blind Spots

As established in earlier reports, this survey reflects a leadership-heavy demographic, with nearly 74% of respondents holding Executive Leadership or Operational Management roles. Despite this seniority, the data exposes a disconnect between general sentiment and specific financial awareness. When asked about the trajectory of their organization’s DSO over the last six months, a startling 33.90% of respondents admitted they “Do Not Know.” Similarly, 25.42% were unaware of their organization’s MRR trajectory. This lack of visibility among senior professionals is a potential vulnerability; high-level confidence unsupported by granular data can lead to strategic missteps, particularly if cash flow tightens unexpectedly.

The Cash Flow Warning: DSO Trends

For those who are tracking the numbers, the signals are mixed. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)—a critical measure of how long it takes to get paid—appears to be stabilizing for many, with 35.59% reporting it as “Unfluctuating.” However, the ratio of negative to positive movement is concerning. 18.64% of respondents report that DSO is “Increasing” (getting paid slower), compared to only 11.86% who see it “Decreasing” (getting paid faster). In an economic environment where “Good” business conditions are fueling investment in expensive AI technologies, a lengthening collection cycle could squeeze liquidity. Growth consumes cash. If clients take longer to pay just as providers ramp up spending on GPU-heavy infrastructure, a liquidity crisis could emerge—dampening the very optimism driving those investments.


eDiscovery Business Metric Trajectory_ Days Sales Outstanding – 2H25


The Stability of the Subscription Economy

The news regarding Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) is far more encouraging, validating the industry’s shift toward subscription and managed services models. A combined 69.49% of respondents report that MRR is either “Unfluctuating” (35.59%) or “Increasing” (33.90%). Only a tiny fraction (5.08%) reported a decrease in recurring revenue. This stability is the bedrock of the industry’s confidence; it provides the predictable cash flow necessary to weather the “lumpy” nature of litigation spikes and supports long-term planning.


eDiscovery Business Metric Trajectory_ Monthly Recurring Revenue – 2H25


Furthermore, customer bases appear remarkably stable, with nearly 45% of respondents reporting an “Unfluctuating” distribution of revenue across their client list, suggesting that retention rates remain high even in a competitive market.


eDiscovery Business Metric Trajectory_ Distribution of Revenue Across Customer Base – 2H25


Implications for the Wider Ecosystem

For eDiscovery professionals, the “Visibility Gap” is a call to action for financial literacy. The “business of eDiscovery” is as critical as the “practice of eDiscovery.” In an era where 12.5% of peers expect lower profits despite higher revenues, the ability to understand and influence metrics like DSO is a career differentiator. Professionals who can link their technical workflows to faster billing cycles—for instance, by using AI to expedite review and trigger earlier invoicing—will become invaluable assets to their leadership teams.

For Cybersecurity professionals, the high percentage of “Do Not Know” responses regarding financial flows presents a unique risk vector. Financial opacity is the playground of threat actors. If a third of the organization’s leadership is unsure about the normal trajectory of billing and collections, anomalies caused by Business Email Compromise (BEC) or invoice fraud may go unnoticed for longer periods. Security leaders should view this lack of financial visibility as a monitoring gap. If human oversight of financial flows is weak, AI-driven anomaly detection becomes the last line of defense against invoice fraud.

For Information Governance (IG) professionals, the operational data highlights a critical value proposition: margin defense. With revenue distribution stable and MRR growing, the primary threat to profitability is the uncontrolled growth of data costs. If revenue is “Unfluctuating” but data volume is increasing (as noted in previous posts), the cost of hosting that data eats directly into the margin. IG professionals are the defenders of that margin. By enforcing defensible deletion and data minimization strategies, they ensure that the “stable” revenue reported in this survey translates into actual profit rather than being consumed by cloud storage fees for redundant data.

In summary, the operational health of the eDiscovery market in 2H 2025 is sound but not without its blind spots. The recurring revenue engine is humming, and customer bases are loyal. However, the creeping increase in DSO and the lack of visibility into these metrics among key players suggest that the industry’s optimism should be tempered with a dose of operational discipline. As the market accelerates into 2026, the winners will be those who not only feel confident but who also know exactly where their cash is—and when it is arriving.

With confidence high and recurring revenues stable, what could go wrong? In Part 4, we confront the growing tension between rising data volumes and stagnant budgets. As data growth outpaces financial resources, this core conflict is emerging as a strategic fault line—forcing eDiscovery professionals to rethink cost control, data governance, and long-term sustainability.



News Source
 
Robinson, R., & Robinson, H. (2025). 2H 2025 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey by ComplexDiscovery OÜ and EDRM. ComplexDiscovery OÜ.

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

Additional Reading

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

The post The Visibility Gap: Operational Metrics and Financial Health in the 2H 2025 eDiscovery Business Confidence Survey appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.

Photo of Alan N. Sutin Alan N. Sutin

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy

Alan N. Sutin is Chair of the firm’s Technology, Media & Telecommunications Practice and Senior Chair of the Global Intellectual Property & Technology Practice. An experienced business lawyer with a principal focus on commercial transactions with intellectual property and technology issues and privacy and cybersecurity matters, he advises clients in connection with transactions involving the development, acquisition, disposition and commercial exploitation of intellectual property with an emphasis on technology-related products and services, and counsels companies on a wide range of issues relating to privacy and cybersecurity. Alan holds the CIPP/US certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Alan also represents a wide variety of companies in connection with IT and business process outsourcing arrangements, strategic alliance agreements, commercial joint ventures and licensing matters. He has particular experience in Internet and electronic commerce issues and has been involved in many of the major policy issues surrounding the commercial development of the Internet. Alan has advised foreign governments and multinational corporations in connection with these issues and is a frequent speaker at major industry conferences and events around the world.