Five months ago, I published “The Transformation Triangle: A New Blueprint for Competitive Advantage in the AI Era.” The thesis was straightforward: in a world where AI capabilities commoditize overnight, sustainable competitive advantage requires the strategic integration of tools, expertise, and education—not just one, but all three working in concert.

I wrote then: “If your competitive advantage is just the software you use, you’re essentially betting your future on something your competitor can purchase tomorrow.”

Tomorrow arrived faster than even I expected.

This morning, legal software stocks are in freefall. LegalZoom, RELX (which owns LexisNexis), and Thomson Reuters have each declined at least 20% year-to-date, with the bleeding accelerating sharply after Anthropic, the maker of Claude, rolled out knowledge work plugins that can track compliance and review legal documents. One AI foundation company, with a Friday afternoon product update, just demonstrated exactly what happens when your moat is merely software.

But here’s what makes this moment fascinating: the legal AI companies that saw this coming have been quietly validating the Transformation Triangle for months. And the evidence is now overwhelming.

If this sounds interesting to you, please read on…

LawDroid Manifesto is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This substack, LawDroid Manifesto, is here to keep you in the loop about the intersection of AI and the law. Please share this article with your friends and colleagues and remember to tell me what you think in the comments below.

Harvey and August Launched Academies on the Same Day

On January 27, 2026, exactly one week ago, both Harvey AI and August publicly launched formal educational academies. The timing was coincidental. The strategic logic was identical.

Harvey Academy offers a flagship “AI for Legal Basics” certification, a 67-minute course providing “practical, responsible guidance on using AI in legal work.” The platform includes training on workflow builders, Microsoft integrations, and prompt engineering, available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Those who complete the course receive digital certificates and LinkedIn badges.

But Harvey didn’t stop at client education. Their Law School Alliance Program, launched in August 2025, now includes 17 law schools: Stanford, NYU, University of Chicago, Penn, Michigan, UCLA, Texas, Vanderbilt, and others.

CEO Winston Weinberg stated it directly: “Law schools fundamentally shape the future of the legal industry.” This is the Education pillar of the Transformation Triangle, executed at scale. Harvey isn’t just selling software. They’re embedding themselves in how the next generation of lawyers learns to practice.

August took a different approach to the same insight. Their 100+ video tutorial library targets solo practitioners and midsize firms, the market segment historically locked out of enterprise AI. Critically, August’s tutorials are free even for non-customers. Co-founder Thomas Bueler-Faudree noted: “None of our competitors are doing this.”

He’s wrong about that now. Everyone is doing this. The question is who started early enough to matter.

The Expertise Arms Race Is Real

When I wrote about the Transformation Triangle, I emphasized that expertise in the AI era “isn’t about knowing more facts (AI wins that game). It’s about pattern recognition in complexity, understanding context and nuance, and most critically, translating between the language of machines and the needs of humans.”

The leading legal AI companies understood this. Their response? Hire the translators.

Harvey has recruited attorneys from Wachtell Lipton, Latham & Watkins, Skadden, White & Case, and Paul Weiss, not for sales roles, but for positions explicitly titled “Legal Engineer.” Job postings require 3-7 years at a top BigLaw firm. Bloomberg Law reported that Harvey CEO Winston Weinberg, himself a former O’Melveny securities litigator, views “domain experts who know different areas of the law” as essential to building products that perform to professional standards.

EvenUp, which recently hit a $2 billion valuation, employs 100+ in-house legal and medical experts, nurses, paralegals, former insurance adjusters, and attorneys with both plaintiff and defense backgrounds. Every AI-generated demand letter undergoes human expert review, enabling their claim of 99% accuracy. This isn’t AI replacing lawyers; it’s AI supervised by lawyers at a scale no traditional firm could match.

Ironclad’s founding story makes the point explicitly. CEO Jason Boehmig is a former Fenwick & West corporate attorney who now teaches “Law 2.0” as an adjunct professor at Notre Dame Law School. His co-founder brings MIT computer science credentials. The company was built to solve problems Boehmig “encountered daily as a corporate attorney.”

This is the Expertise pillar operationalized. Legal AI companies aren’t competing on model capability, Claude and GPT are available to everyone. They’re competing on the quality of legal judgment embedded in the product.

The Certification Arms Race Has Begun

The most sophisticated players have moved beyond education into certification, creating credentials that validate user competency while simultaneously creating switching costs.

Luminance launched its AI Certification Pathway in September 2025, partnering with the University of Law (UK’s largest law school), King’s College London, and Vanderbilt’s AI Law Lab. The program provides industry-recognized certifications issued directly by Luminance. Harry Borovick, Luminance’s General Counsel, teaches master’s courses at King’s College London and authored AI and the Law, bridging commercial and academic credibility.

Spellbook achieved remarkable law school penetration: 50+ schools using their platform by late 2025, including Harvard, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, and WashU. CEO Scott Stevenson noted: “In just a year, we’ve gone from a pilot to more than 50 schools using Spellbook to prepare their students for the next evolution of practice.” Free access for all law school faculty and students globally through 2026.

LexisNexis responded with its AI Insider Program and Commercial Preview Program, partnering with Am Law 50 firms including Baker McKenzie and Reed Smith as “living laboratories” for product development.

These certification programs serve a dual purpose. They accelerate adoption and create relationship stickiness. When your credential is tied to a specific platform, switching becomes a professional identity question, not just a software procurement decision.

Why This Matters Right Now

Which brings us back to this morning’s stock sell-off.

Anthropic’s legal plugins demonstrate that foundation model companies can replicate legal software functionality with minimal effort. Compliance tracking? Document review? These are table-stakes features that Claude can now perform out of the box. The companies that built their competitive advantage solely on these capabilities, the Tools pillar alone, are watching their moats drain in real-time.

But notice who isn’t panicking: Harvey, at an $8 billion valuation. Thomson Reuters, despite the stock decline, with 1,600+ attorneys on staff building AI products. Luminance, with academic certifications rolling out across three continents. Clio, has transitioned from a system of record to a system of action, and in the process has leveraged its customers’ deep data as context for its AI.

These companies understood something the market is just now processing. When information and basic functionality are commoditized, the new currency is trusted guidance, contextual expertise, and the ability to empower others.

The Transformation Triangle isn’t a defense against AI disruption. It’s a strategy for surviving the moment when the foundation model companies decide your industry is interesting enough to enter.

That moment, for legal tech, was last Friday.

Closing Thoughts

I wrote five months ago that “the firms and professionals who will dominate the next decade aren’t building higher moats—they’re building stronger bridges.”

The evidence is now in. Harvey Academy. August’s tutorial library. Luminance’s university certifications. Thomson Reuters’ $200 million education investment. Ironclad’s lawyer-founders teaching at law schools. The entire industry has converged on the same strategic framework.

But convergence means the window for first-mover advantage is closing. The companies that invested in education and expertise 18 months ago are now reaping compound returns. The companies scrambling to launch academies today are playing catch-up. And the companies that still believe their software alone will protect them?

Ask LegalZoom shareholders how that’s working out this morning.

The Transformation Triangle was never just a theory. It was a prediction about what sustainable competitive advantage would require in the age of AI. The market is now pricing in the difference between companies that understood this early and companies that didn’t.

The moat is gone. The bridge was always the answer.

Related: