Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

FTC Seeks Comment on Potential Rule to Address Unfair or Deceptive Rental Housing Fee Practices

By Timothy A. Butler & Caitlin Sophy-Croley on March 18, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FTC

On March 12, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) seeking public comment on a proposed rulemaking to address potential unfair or deceptive fee practices in connection with rental housing.

“Rental pricing practices that are neither clear nor transparent undermine competition and harm consumers,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a press release announcing the ANPRM. “The Trump-Vance FTC is focused on addressing unlawful business conduct that obscures the actual cost of housing and undermines price competition.”

This development demonstrates that the FTC remains focused on so-called “junk fees,” following its issuance of the Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees, sometimes called the “Junk Fees Rule,” which became effective on May 12, 2025, as we noted in an earlier GT Alert.

Rental Housing Fee Practices

In its press release announcing the ANPRM, the FTC said that the “failure to advertise the true total rent limits consumers’ ability to make informed financial decisions, increasing their search costs and exposing them to other negative monetary consequences when they take on more rent than they can afford.”

Consistent with those concerns, the ANPRM seeks public comment, including data, evidence, analyses and arguments, on whether a rule is needed to prevent unfair or deceptive fee practices in connection with rental housing. The FTC request for public comment focuses on five areas of concern:

  • Total Rent. Do rental housing providers fail to clearly and conspicuously disclose or misrepresent the true total rent for a unit or property including all mandatory fees or charges?
  • Fees and Charges. Do rental housing providers fail to clearly and conspicuously disclose or misrepresent the nature, purpose, amount, refundability, optionality and recurrence of fees or charges?
  • Application Fees. What practices do rental housing providers engage in relating to application fees that harm consumers?
  • Security Deposits. What practices do rental housing providers engage in relating to security deposits that harm consumers?
  • Billing Issues. What practices do rental housing providers engage in relating to billing that harm consumers?
  • Consumer Choice. What practices do rental housing providers engage in that harm consumers by impeding consumer choice?

Once the ANPRM is published in the Federal Register, the public will have 30 days to submit comments.

Takeaways

State and federal consumer protection agencies remain focused on so-called “junk fees,” with new investigations and rulemaking opening at a regular clip. Indeed, a day before it issued the ANPRM, the FTC announced that it would send checks totaling almost $50 million to almost 500,000 affected consumers, pursuant to its September 2024 settlement with a rental-housing industry participant regarding alleged unfair and deceptive fees practices.

Given this continued focus, businesses, including financial services firm offering home or apartment rental management solutions, should watch for “junk-fee” related developments at both the state and federal levels and may wish to fine-tune their compliance programs in light of those developments.

We have provided ongoing analysis of junk-fee-related developments, including the developments addressed in our prior client alerts and blog posts:

  • FTC Alleges Fintech Cleo AI Deceived Consumers (March 31, 2025)
  • FTC Alleges Fintech Dave, Inc. Deceived Consumers (Nov. 15, 2024)
  • FTC Targets Adobe for Hidden Fees and Deceptive Subscriptions (July 9, 2024)
  • CFPB Launches Public Inquiry into Rising Mortgage Closing Costs and ‘Junk Fees’ (June 4, 2024)
  • FTC Takes Action Against Doxo, Citing Junk Fees (June 3, 2024)
  • California AG Publishes FAQs on California’s ‘Junk Fee’ Law (May 30, 2024)
  • Tim Butler Quoted in LA Times Article on California ‘Junk Fees’ (Apr. 11, 2024)
  • CFPB Releases Report Highlighting Junk Fees on Mortgage Servicing (March 23, 2024)
  • CFPB Unveils Final Rule Banning ‘Excessive’ Credit Card Late Fees (Mar. 13, 2024)
  • CFPB Issues Proposed Rule to Stop ‘Junk Fees’ on Bank Accounts (Feb. 1. 2024)
  • California Bans Hidden Fees, Effective July 1, 2024 (Oct. 17, 2023)
  • FTC Proposed Rule Targeting ‘Junk Fees’ (Oct. 16, 2023)
  • CFPB Issues Advisory Opinion on ‘Illegal Junk Fees’ By Large Financial Firms (Oct. 12, 2023)
Photo of Timothy A. Butler Timothy A. Butler

Tim Butler helps companies thrive by developing tailored strategies to address their regulatory compliance challenges and vigorously defending them in government enforcement actions and bet-the-company lawsuits.

A former prosecuting attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and former senior official in the Georgia

…

Tim Butler helps companies thrive by developing tailored strategies to address their regulatory compliance challenges and vigorously defending them in government enforcement actions and bet-the-company lawsuits.

A former prosecuting attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and former senior official in the Georgia Attorney General’s Office, Tim has led the defense of dozens of government investigations and enforcement actions brought by the FTC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and the various state attorneys general. Tim also regularly defends clients in bet-the-company lawsuits, including complex business disputes and consumer class actions alleging privacy, false advertising, and unfair or deceptive business practice claims.

Tim is an experienced guide for companies struggling with regulatory complexity. He offers clear advice that helps his clients meet the demands of the ever-growing set of laws and regulations governing data privacy and cybersecurity, advertising and marketing practices, and consumer financial products and services. Clients rely on Tim’s business-minded and practical strategies to address their most difficult regulatory compliance challenges.

A graduate of the University of Chicago and Stanford Law School, Tim is a prolific author and regularly speaks to industry and trade groups about the evolving privacy landscape, about cutting-edge issues affecting payments and fintech companies, and about developments at the FTC, the CFPB, and within the state attorneys general community.

Read more about Timothy A. ButlerTimothy's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Caitlin Sophy-Croley Caitlin Sophy-Croley

Caitlin Sophy-Croley is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Atlanta office.

Read more about Caitlin Sophy-CroleyCaitlin's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, International
  • Blog:
    Financial Services Observer
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo