Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

PAGA 3.0 – What You Need to Know About California’s Labor and Workforce Development Agency’s Proposed Regulations

By Gregory Knopp & Michelle Lappen on March 10, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

For the first time, the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”) has proposed regulations concerning the administrative processes and review requirements of Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”).

Key Provisions

The proposed regulations, if finalized as written, include the following noteworthy provisions:

  • High-Frequency and Vexatious Filers: § 17415(a)(2) addresses “documented instances of some attorneys filing  PAGA notices that are based on templates alleging frivolous, conclusory, or boilerplate violations of the Labor Code[,]” which “interferes with the [LWDA]’s role and ability to perform its responsibilities under the law,” “deprives employers of fair and proper notice of the violations alleged against them, including for purposes of identifying the bases for the violations alleged so they may take appropriate corrective or prospective compliance measures,” and therefore is “detrimental and harmful to the interests of workers whom the law is intended to protect.” The LWDA also expressly calls out these filings as often part of “an apparent strategy of using PAGA notices as a bargaining chip in seeking quick individual settlements and attorneys’ fees recoveries.” Accordingly, the proposed regulations include “certain safeguards … to prevent such abusive practices” in the form of additional cover letter and certification requirements.
  • Cure for Smaller Employers: The proposed regulations flesh out how the cure mechanisms work before any suit is filed against employers with fewer than 100 employees, detailing the requirements for an employer’s cure proposal and protecting such submissions as confidential settlement communications subject to Evidence Code section 1152.
  • Settlement Oversight: § 17420.5(d) provides that “a claimant may not amend a PAGA notice to add violations not alleged in a prior PAGA notice as part of, or at any time after the claimant has reached, a proposed settlement agreement with the employer in a pending civil action.” This proposal would make resolving overlapping PAGA claims via a single lawsuit more difficult. The proposed regulations also require (1) at least 45 days for the LWDA to review any proposed settlement agreement; and (2) notice to other employees who have filed LWDA notices against the same employer.

Current Status

The written comment period for these proposed regulations closes on March 23, 2026. The LWDA has indicated that while no public hearing is currently scheduled, it will hold one if it receives a written request from any interested person. We’ll continue to monitor how these regulations progress.

Photo of Gregory Knopp Gregory Knopp

Gregory (Greg) Knopp is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department in the Los Angeles office.

Greg defends companies in class and collective actions and other complex disputes. He has argued successfully before state and federal courts across the country and…

Gregory (Greg) Knopp is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department in the Los Angeles office.

Greg defends companies in class and collective actions and other complex disputes. He has argued successfully before state and federal courts across the country and has obtained dismissals of class actions in dozens of high-profile, highly consequential matters.

Greg’s clients range from entertainment companies to prominent retailers to professional sports leagues. He has also worked with financial services and other professional services firms, along with clients in the technology, transportation and healthcare spaces. All look to Greg for his ability to quickly spot legal issues and to determine strategies to maximize advantage.

With more than 20 years of experience in employment litigation, Greg has represented clients in a wide range of employment disputes involving wage and hour issues, issues specific to California employment law, sexual harassment, and arbitration compulsion.

Read more about Gregory Knopp
Show more Show less
Photo of Michelle Lappen Michelle Lappen

Michelle Lappen is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group. She assists clients in a wide range of labor and employment matters in a variety of industries, including entertainment, financial services, and…

Michelle Lappen is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group. She assists clients in a wide range of labor and employment matters in a variety of industries, including entertainment, financial services, and technology.

Michelle earned her J.D. from Columbia Law School, where she was an articles and submissions editor for the Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts. During law school, she also was a teaching fellow for the Advanced Negotiation Workshop and advocated for state and federal legislation as a clinical student in the Columbia Law Health Justice Advocacy Clinic.

Read more about Michelle Lappen
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    California Employment Law Update
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo