Intellectual Property

The U.S. Supreme Court has once again been urged to revisit 35 U.S.C. § 101, the statute governing patent eligibility. Audio Evolution Diagnostics, Inc. (AED) filed a petition for writ of certiorari, challenging the Federal Circuit’s summary affirmance under Rule 36 of a ruling that invalidated its patents under the Alice/Mayo framework. Should the SCOTUS

The U.S. Copyright Office’s January 2025 report on AI and copyrightability reaffirms the longstanding principle that copyright protection is reserved for works of human authorship. Outputs created entirely by generative artificial intelligence (AI), with no human creative input, are not eligible for copyright protection. The Office offers a framework for assessing human authorship for works

Today marks the commencement of the gradual application timeline of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). It is worth emphasizing this point to avoid common misinterpretations. While the entire regulation has been in force since August 2024, today specifically marks the application of Title I, “General Provisions,” and Title II, “Prohibited AI Practices.” Under Title

Bugün AB Yapay Zeka Tüzüğü’nün kademeli uygulama takviminin başlangıç günü. İfadelerdeki hatalardan kaçınmak için vurgulamakta fayda var. Tüm Tüzük zaten Ağustos 2024’ten beri yürürlükte ama bugün “Genel Hükümler” başlıklı I ve ”Yasaklanan Yapay Zeka Uygulamaları” başlıklı II numaralı bölümlerin uygulanmaya başlama günü. I numaralı bölümün altında -herkes görmezden gelse de- aslında 4,II numaralı bölümde ise