On 4 November 2025 the UK High Court handed down its judgment in the case of Getty Images (US) Inc (and others) v Stability AI Limited [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) [High Court Judgment Template].
The case concerned the training, development and deployment of Stability AI’s “Stable Diffusion” generative AI model and, as one
Introduction
A collision is on the horizon. The collision is between a strict interpretation of the human authorship requirement under U.S. copyright law, and the ascendence of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) as an essential element of modern creativity. From publishing and advertising to music, film, media, and software development, AI systems are reshaping workflows and
Background
On 19 November 2025, the European Commission presented its much-anticipated Digital “Omnibus” package[1] intended to ease the administrative and compliance burden facing European businesses. Executive Vice-President of the Commission Henna Virkkunen stated that “[f]rom factories to start-ups, the digital package is the EU’s answer to calls to reduce burdens on our businesses.”[2]
The $100 million theft of royal jewels from the Louvre reignited global debate over art ownership, restitution, and authenticity. Beneath the headlines lies a legal conflict cutting across property rights, heritage claims, and international enforcement. Cultural IP law governs the transition of artifacts from cultural heritage to legal evidence and defines who can assert ownership
On November 4, 2025, the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) designated as precedential an appeals review panel (ARP) decision vacating the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s § 101 rejection of claims directed to training machine learning models. Ex parte Desjardins, Appeal No. 24-000567 (ARP Sept. 26, 2025) (precedential). The Board
Proprietary data has become leverage. As predictive analytics and AI systems drive real-time decisions in sports, finance, and enterprise operations, the integrity of internal data now defines legal exposure. The FBI’s recent investigation into NBA insiders accused of leaking injury and lineup data for gambling purposes highlights the operational risk. Data integrity law has emerged
Regulatory oversight has shifted from reactive to proactive. Boards and executives now operate in a landscape where enforcement actions move faster, target leadership, and expand across jurisdictions. Corporate compliance law is no longer a support function. It is a strategic tool responsible for safeguarding decision-making, strengthening public trust, and preserving enterprise value.
The New Normal
Tribunale UE, sentenza del 10 settembre 2025, causa T-288/24, Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) c. EUIPO
Il Tribunale ha chiarito che la semplicità e la brevità di un motivo sonoro non equivalgono a banalità e assenza di carattere distintivo, in quanto quest’ultimo deve essere valutato alla luce della funzione effettiva che il suono svolge nei confronti del
Creative Expression, Feuds, & Cross Words Across Borders
By James P. Flynn, Epstein Becker Green
The legal intersection of music, poetry, and defamation presents a fascinating landscape where creativity collides with reputational interests. The recent decision in Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc.—filed by Canadian rapper Aubrey “Drake” Graham over the diss track Not Like
On August 4, 2025, the USPTO issued a memo to patent examiners with the subject “Reminders on evaluating subject matter eligibility of claims under 35 U.S.C. 101.” [1] Much has been made of these reminders and what they might signal in terms of a possible shift in how the Office treats rejections under § 101, in particular