Traverse Legal Expert Articles

Latest from Traverse Legal Expert Articles

Your AI platform may inspect user prompts, generated outputs, or uploaded files to improve safety or enforce your policies. That decision can create legal obligations that many AI companies do not expect. 
Federal law does not require AI platforms to monitor everything their users do. But once your platform obtains actual knowledge of apparent child sexual abuse material

Your AI image model can generate content that no human ever created. That does not necessarily mean the content is legal. Many AI companies assume there is no criminal exposure if an image does not depict a real person. Federal law does not always make that distinction. 
One federal statute specifically addresses certain computer-generated images, including AI-generated images, even when no actual minor exists. If your platform can generate this type of content, your compliance analysis should

Your AI model can create realistic fake images of real people. Your platform can store those images, and your users can share them with others. Those capabilities can trigger federal law, even if you think of your business as a neutral AI infrastructure provider rather than a content platform. 
The TAKE IT DOWN Act creates new compliance obligations for many AI companies

An AI governance policy defines how AI is managed across the organization. It is the starting point for meeting current insurance expectations and reducing underwriting friction. Underwriters no longer accept informal oversight. They expect a documented system showing where AI is used, how it is approved, and who is accountable for its operation. 
At a minimum, this includes

AI compliance and insurance are now directly connected. Most companies assume their existing insurance covers AI-related risks. That assumption became wrong in 2026.  The “silent AI” era is over. Until recently, AI risks were absorbed into existing policies because nothing explicitly excluded them. Coverage existed by default, not by design. 
AI insurance requirements changed when insurers

Why AI Copyright Litigation Matters Now
The litigation wave has moved from theory to active precedent
AI copyright litigation no longer sits in the abstract. Courts have now issued early fair use rulings on AI training, and those rulings have started to shape how publishers, creators, model developers, and investors assess legal exposure. Morrison Foerster

AI copyright memorization now drives real product risk, not academic debate. A new paper, Extracting books from production language models, reports a method for pulling long blocks of in-copyright book text from several production-grade language models. 
Model output matters because it sits in front of customers. If a model reproduces protected text, plaintiffs can frame