Privacy & Data Security

Virginia’s Governor, Glenn Youngkin, vetoed a bill this week that would have regulated “high-risk” artificial intelligence systems. HB 2094, which narrowly passed the state legislature, aimed to implement regulatory measures akin to those established by last year’s Colorado AI Act. At the same time, Colorado’s AI Impact Task Force issued concerns about the

@media screen and (max-width: 1023px){section[data-id=”block_2fae9574415b7f2489621e16195d45b7″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1365px){section[data-id=”block_2fae9574415b7f2489621e16195d45b7″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1366px){section[data-id=”block_2fae9574415b7f2489621e16195d45b7″]{ }}

In the beginning of March, I gave a presentation on AI legal developments. One of the attendees astutely pointed out that the current legal framework seems to focus on B2C use cases. I agreed. The focus is consumer protection. About 10 days later, I spoke at an AI contracting livestreaming event. Preparing for it gave

@media screen and (max-width: 1023px){section[data-id=”block_a43728c71e961e1426b6f689d18ce9c6″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1365px){section[data-id=”block_a43728c71e961e1426b6f689d18ce9c6″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1366px){section[data-id=”block_a43728c71e961e1426b6f689d18ce9c6″]{ }}