https://medium.com/media/56841b21bf228e841d64486001ca986c/hrefLaurie Yoler led a candid discussion with Jessica Denecour, Louis Lehot, Logan McDougal, and Brian M. Wong on how the board evaluation process is evolving, and why board “effectiveness” must now be treated as a strategic priority rather than a procedural requirement.It was clear from the discussion that board evaluations are

On December 2, 2025, Brian Daly, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Division of Investment Management (the “Division”), delivered remarks to the American Bar Association outlining the Division’s top priorities under his leadership: deregulation, modernization, democratization, and artificial intelligence (“AI”).

Daly noted that the Division’s agenda will largely be driven by the

Last month, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 683, which makes a significant addition to Civil Code § 3344, California’s Right of Publicity statute. With the amendment, § 3344 now expressly authorizes injunctive relief, which strengthens individuals’ ability to protect their name, image, voice, and likeness from unauthorized use.

Previously, under the prior version of § 3344, a person whose name, image, or likeness was used on merchandise products and in advertising without prior consent could recover statutory or actual damages, any profits attributable to the use, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees and costs. Now, the new law clarifies that those monetary remedies are not exclusive, and a plaintiff may also seek temporary restraining orders (TROs) and preliminary injunctions under California Code of Civil Procedure § 527. Furthermore, if a court grants a TRO, the defendant must “remove, recall, or otherwise cease” the unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness within two business days after the order is served, unless the court’s order states otherwise. Although courts already had the power to issue injunctive relief under general civil procedure when irreparable harm could be shown, there was no explicit statutory right associated with right of publicity claims and no time deadlines for TRO compliance by defendants. SB 683 makes the remedial process more concrete, giving right of publicity plaintiffs a quicker route to stop the misuse of their name, image, or likeness, rather than being at risk of ongoing irreparable harm and waiting for a final judgment.

At Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg Center, the “Open to Debate” podcast convened an audience of students, journalists, and policy thinkers to dissect one of the defining questions of our era: Should the U.S. government break up Big Tech?

On stage were four heavyweight voices: Bharat Ramamurti and Matt Stoller arguing Yes, that concentrated tech power threatens competition, democracy, and