On December 4, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. EST, the SEC Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) will hold a virtual public meeting which will include discussion about a draft recommendation to the Commission for disclosure by companies about their use of artificial intelligence. The draft recommendation would require issuers to:
As readers may recall, in February 2024, the USPTO issued guidance on inventorship in AI-assisted inventions, which we wrote about here. On November 26, 2025, the USPTO rescinded that guidance and replaced it with new guidance.
By way of background, the February 2024 Guidance analyzed the naming of inventors for AI-assisted inventions using the Pannu factors, which state that an inventor must (1) contribute in some significant manner to the conception or reduction to practice of an invention, (2) make a contribution to the claimed invention that is not insignificant in quality when measured against the full invention, and (3) do more than merely explain well-known concepts and/or the current state of the art. In the February 2024 Guidance, the USPTO noted that in the context of AI-assisted inventions, the Pannu factors were informed by the following considerations:
Hey there Legal Rebels! 👋 I’m excited to share with you the 47th episode of the 2025 season of the LawDroid Manifesto podcast, where I will be continuing to interview key legal innovators to learn how they do what they do. I think you’re going to enjoy this one!I’ve been fortunate to know Brian Liu
The authors wish to thank Sirrul Choudhury for his contributions to this post.
On 20 November 2025 the UK government confirmed that the secondary legislation which is required to clarify and bring into force the new consumer subscription contract regime under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA) [A New Era for Consumer Law and Regulation | Global IP & Technology Law Blog] will be delayed until autumn 2026 at the earliest. This marks a shift from the government’s earlier position that the new regime (which will impose new specific requirements on businesses offering consumers subscription contracts designed to ensure consumers understand what they are signing up to and can easily cancel) would come into force in spring 2026.
In all the time I have practiced law, I have never used artificial intelligence to write a legal brief. This is because there have been so many instances of AI writing legal briefs that contain citations to cases and laws that do not exist. Recently, a business that provides technology support for my firm asked
Key point: The President’s latest Executive Order establishes the Genesis Mission and aspires to use AI to accelerate scientific discovery in sectors such as biotech, quantum, nuclear power, and semiconductors.
In today’s competitive global talent environment, employment-based nonimmigrant and immigrant visa categories remain essential tools for U.S. employers trying to attract, transfer, or retain high-skilled professionals. Recent trends show that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has adopted a significantly more stringent approach to adjudicating related petitions.
USCIS has recently made several changes that are
Introduction
California enacted several new employment laws in 2025, including enhanced penalties for wage and hour violations, expanded pay data reporting requirements, broadened sexual harassment protections, stronger pay equity and transparency measures, measures addressing tip theft, restriction of employee loan repayment, expanded time off and use of sick pay benefits, additional personnel records requirements, and
If your defense to a harassment complaint starts with “well, technically…” you’ve already lost — even if you win the lawsuit.
A recent Sixth Circuit decision, Wargo v. MJR Partridge Creek Digital Cinema, is the latest reminder that “not illegal” is a terrible benchmark for acceptable workplace behavior.
The court held that the manager’s
Here’s the problem: your law firm might be dominating Google’s AI Overviews right now, and you’d have no idea. Or you could be completely invisible.
Most law firms have zero visibility into whether their AIO (Artificial Intelligence Optimization) efforts are working. Traditional metrics like keyword rankings don’t capture AI Overview performance. The tools to measure
