If you’re fighting this hard to hide a file, everyone already knows what’s in it.
Donald Trump trying to stop the release of the Epstein files feels a lot like that lawyer in discovery who really doesn’t want to turn over a document.
You know the type. They argue every privilege, invent new ones, insist
The Court also found limited trademark infringement and seemingly departed from EU law.
By Sophie Goossens and Brett Shandler
On 4 November 2025, the High Court of England and Wales (the Court) handed down its long-awaited judgment in Getty Images v. Stability AI, a case brought by various entities in the Getty Images group
Logan Evan Gans, Andrew M. Piper
Creative Expression, Feuds, & Cross Words Across Borders
By James P. Flynn, Epstein Becker Green
The legal intersection of music, poetry, and defamation presents a fascinating landscape where creativity collides with reputational interests. The recent decision in Graham v. UMG Recordings, Inc.—filed by Canadian rapper Aubrey “Drake” Graham over the diss track Not Like Us by Kendrick Lamar, a rapper who grew up in Compton, California—offers a contemporary lens on this tension. Yet, the legal questions it raises resonate globally, from India to the United Kingdom to the US, illustrating both the universality and jurisdiction-specific nuances of evaluating artistic speech in the defamation context.
What is a diss track?
My sense is that many of us have heard this term, and probably have heard specifically about the diss tracks in this feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar. Indeed, some of us are old enough to remember the earlier, more innocent times when Carly Simon’s You’re So Vain was considered a diss track of sorts, albeit with targets of disparagement that were a bit more ambiguous. But, in short, as one resource summarizes it, the definition of such a track is:
FINRA’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert Cook, recently published a blog post describing FINRA’s ongoing efforts to integrate artificial intelligence (“AI”), including generative AI (“GenAI”), into its regulatory program and engage with member firms regarding their use of GenAI. Below we highlight how FINRA is using GenAI to perform its self-regulatory functions more effectively
On August 4, 2025, the USPTO issued a memo to patent examiners with the subject “Reminders on evaluating subject matter eligibility of claims under 35 U.S.C. 101.” [1] Much has been made of these reminders and what they might signal in terms of a possible shift in how the Office treats rejections under § 101, in particular
Small firm lawyers keep telling me they can’t afford the AI tools big firms use. They’re not wrong, I’ve heard vendors literally laugh at affordability concerns. So when I came across Descrybe, a legal research platform with free core features (and paid plans at only $10-20/month), it got my attendtion and I dug deeper. Here’s
The EU Commission recently held a call for evidence on “simplification” of legislation in the data, cybersecurity, and AI space, ahead of a “Digital Omnibus” Act. These changes look to make the EU’s digital rulebook more innovation-friendly, supporting the Commission’s Competitiveness Compass.
The Commission is due to present its simplification proposals on 19 November. Ahead
The headlines are alarming. Reports detail patients being harmed, misled, or outright failed by popular AI apps. Stories like these are emotionally charged, and my preliminary assessment of the seven high-profile cases recently documented by Information Age is that at least some may have genuine merit.
It’s easy to read about a chatbot giving harmful advice and
