Blog Authors

Latest from AI Law

Abstract New generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can increasingly engage in personalized, sustained and natural conversations with users. This technology has the capacity to reshape the financial services industry, making customized expert financial advice broadly available to consumers. However, AI’s ability to convincingly mimic human financial advisors also creates significant risks of large-scale financial misconduct.

Arizona’s highest court has created a pair of AI-generated avatars to deliver news of every ruling issued by the justices, marking what is believed to be the first example in the U.S. of a state court system tapping artificial intelligence to build more human-like characters to connect with the public. A court in Florida uses an animated

I have no idea what she’s on about but far more fun than watching a lexis nexis video and illustrates that it’s not just dull whhite men flogging the tech – some level of democratization happening here.

By Kimberly Breier, Gerónimo Gutiérrez Fernández & Lorena Montes de Oca on March 14, 2025 Since 2020, over 60 bills have been introduced in the Mexican Congress seeking to regulate artificial intelligence (AI). In the absence of general AI legal framework, these bills have sought to regulate a broad range of issues, including governance, education, intellectual property, and data protection. Mexico

The company’s law firm customers are building their AI strategies on DeepJudge, providing their AI apps and agents with instant, trusted institutional knowledge With DeepJudge AI Workflows, we can connect LLMs and AI agents to everything we’ve ever worked on—unlocking entirely new possibilities.” — Joe Green, Chief Innovation Officer at Gunderson Dettmer ZURICH, SWITZERLAND, March

About the Event AI tools are transforming how attorneys work across the profession, creating both opportunities for efficiency and questions about the future role of lawyers. This session will explore the real-world integration of these technologies at Quinn Emanuel, addressing the concerns many law students have about how these changes might affect their career trajectories

A federal magistrate judge has recommended a $15,000 sanction against Texas-based attorney Rafael Ramirez after he cited fictitious court cases generated by an AI tool. As The Register reports, Judge Mark J Dinsmore of the Southern District of Indiana found Ramirez guilty of failing to verify the authenticity of three cases in his legal brief.