Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

Lauren Leipold and Owen Wolfe Write on Use of Generative AI Prompts in Litigation in Reuters Westlaw

By Lauren Gregory Leipold & Owen Wolfe on September 26, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
AI, Artificial Intelligence, keyboard, machine learning, natural language processing, chatbots, virtual assistants, automation, robotics, computer vision, deep learning, neural networks, language models, human-computer interaction, cognitive computing, data analytics, innovation, technology advancements, futuristic systems, intelligent systems, smart devices, IoT, cybernetics, algorithms, data science, predictive modeling, pattern recognition, computer science, software engineering, information technology, digital intelligence, autonomous systems, IA, Inteligencia Artificial,
BoliviaInteligente, Unsplash

Gadgets, Gigabytes, & Goodwill Blog editors, Lauren Leipold and Owen Wolfe, co-authored an article, “Rules for use of AI-generated evidence in flux,” in Reuters and Reuters’ Westlaw Today. The Seyfarth attorneys discussed how generative AI prompts and outputs are discoverable in litigation, even those that were part of pre-suit investigation, and that parameters around use of this type of evidence are still relatively unclear.

“Litigants should be thinking carefully about privilege, spoliation, reliability and authentication issues that will inevitably arise around AI-generated materials.”

The full article is available in Reuters and Reuters’ Westlaw Today.

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property, Technology, Trademark
  • Blog:
    Gadgets, Gigabytes & Goodwill Blog
  • Organization:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo