Skip to content

Menu

Network by SubjectChannelsBlogsHomeAboutContact
AI Legal Journal logo
Subscribe
Search
Close
PublishersBlogsNetwork by SubjectChannels
Subscribe

4 solid steps to win your disability discrimination/reasonable accommodation case

By Jesse Beatson on January 8, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The 6th Circuit just delivered an opinion that reinforces two lessons employers should already know: accommodations require clarity and documentation, and timecard falsification is a litigation killer.

Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp. reassigned a maintenance supervisor with nearly 30 years of service to 12-hour night shifts. He complained that the schedule was worsening his Type 2 diabetes, specifically that the night shift was “killing” him. Management told him to provide medical documentation if he needed an accommodation. Upon his presentation of a doctor’s note, the company moved him to day shift as requested.

Then came the problem. The company audited his outage time entries against objective badge-swipe data from the plant’s protected area. The audit revealed discrepancies in 21 of 26 entries, including 10 overstated by more than 30 minutes. Management interviewed him (with a witness present), reviewed security data, escalated the issue to HR, and a separate internal review team conducted its own investigation. The company fired him for falsifying time records.

He sued for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation.

The 6th Circuit affirmed summary judgment across the board.

First, there was no failure to accommodate. The employer was entitled to request medical documentation—and acted promptly upon receipt. The court rejected the employee’s attempt to reframe his termination as the accommodation failure itself.

Second, timecard falsification is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for termination. The employee didn’t deny the discrepancies existed. He argued they were mistakes or caused by his diabetes. That doesn’t matter. Under the honest-belief rule, courts don’t second-guess a decision made after a reasonably informed investigation.

Third, his comparator evidence went nowhere. He couldn’t show similarly situated employees committed comparable integrity violations and kept their jobs.

Finally, the retaliation claim failed for the same reason: no pretext.

Employers, here are your four key takeaways.

 
1.) Document accommodation requests and responses.
2.) Use objective data when investigating misconduct.
3.) Interview, corroborate, and escalate appropriately.
4.) If integrity is the issue, treat it as a bright line.

You can accommodate a disability and still enforce honest timekeeping and other work rules. If you do it correctly, courts will back you up.

     

Related Stories

  • “We can’t do that” is not an ADA interactive process. Or is it?
  • What does a font have to do with an employer’s values? Apparently, a lot.
  • Jury tags SHRM for $11.5 million in discrimination lawsuit

 

Photo of Jesse Beatson Jesse Beatson
Read more about Jesse Beatson
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Ohio Employer Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Jon Hyman
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog logo
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog. All Rights Reserved.
Legal content Portal by LexBlog LexBlog Logo