Rock ‘n’ roll has a long history of protest music.
From Woody Guthrie’s Tear the Fascists Down to Rage Against the Machine’s Killing in the Name, musicians have been poking power in the eye for decades. It’s loud. It’s uncomfortable. That’s the point.
Right now, the amps are pointed squarely at ICE.
Springsteen has
States have enacted various employment-related laws that took effect in 2026. These laws cover various topics such as gig worker and whistleblower protections, employment contracts, data privacy, and workplace and pay transparency. This post includes a survey of some of the more notable laws that are now in place but does not include all such
Agentic AI refers to AI systems that can independently plan, decide, and act toward a goal across multiple steps, often invoking tools, APIs, or other systems without continuous human prompting. Unlike traditional generative AI—which produces content in response to a user prompt—agentic AI systems execute workflows, make decisions based on context, and adapt their behavior
The Connecticut Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) issued an updated Enforcement Report (“Enforcement Report”) under the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CTDPA”). The Enforcement Report discusses the OAG’s enforcement actions in 2025 and suggests some areas of focus from the regulator, summarized below.
Manual contract review is burning out your legal team and delaying deals. Learn how AI contract analysis tools like SpotDraft VerifAI cut review times by 70%.
AI can write your law firm content in seconds—but it can also cite cases that don’t exist, violate client confidentiality, and trigger ethics complaints. If you’re using AI tools without understanding the risks, you might be doing more harm than good. This is your cautionary tale.
The post Are You Using AI Tools to Generate
In Fletcher v. Experian Inform. Solutions, Inc., No. 25-20086 (5th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026), the Fifth Circuit enters a $2,500 sanction against a lawyer who filed a brief with “quotations, citations, and assertions that were not supported by the underlying case law” and were, to all appearances, AI-generated. The opinion drops some hints about
While not California specific, a first-of-its-kind ruling in federal court establishes that a client’s use of AI-generated chat content is not protected by an attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. You can find a summary of the case, United States v. Heppner, a criminal securities fraud case, here. This is important because HR
