For more than two decades, the legal world has celebrated a major achievement: open access to law. Judgments are available online. Legislation is searchable. The idea that primary legal materials should be publicly available on the internet is no longer controversial in most jurisdictions. But availability is not the same as usability.
A database full
If the defining factor in your idea of growth is headcount, you may be fooling yourself.
For starters, as AI runs roughshod through the marketplace, the size of your organization is becoming irrelevant..
Then there are the numbers.
I was visiting with a law firm that over the past five years had grown in
If you’d like to receive more content like this, join 5,000+ other lawyers and legal marketers who subscribe to my Legal Growth email newsletter here. A viral essay made the rounds recently make the case that AI is about to do to every profession what it’s already doing to software engineering. The author, a
We just shipped two features that work at different layers but serve the same goal: making every piece of content in the LexBlog Library easier to find, easier to reference and correctly attributed—whether the reader is a person, a search engine or an AI system.
Here’s what changed and why it matters.
Addressable Headings and
If you’re a lawyer publishing insight and commentary on your niche area of law, where do you want your publishing to live?
Of course, you’ll still want publishing on your website. People who find you by word of mouth, through search, or even through an LLM will look you up there. But that audience is
Courts issued two seemingly conflicting rulings on whether AI generated materials are protected. Heppner (S.D.N.Y.) found that documents created with a consumer version of Claude AI were not privileged or work product because the tool exposed data to a third party provider. Warner (E.D. Mich.) reached the opposite result the same day on different facts,
Before getting started on the blog entry of the week, an update/supplemental information on a couple of prior cases that we have discussed previously. First, EEOC v. William Beaumont Hospital, which we discussed here, resulted in a consent decree. The hospital has to pay the plaintiff $30,000 in noneconomic and compensatory damages. Also, within
On February 10, 2026, federal district court Judge Jed S. Rakoff ruled from the bench in the Southern District of New York that the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine did not protect legal strategy materials that a criminal defendant generated using a generative AI tool, when he used a public version of the
Global Legal Post covered how Intapp is now working with leading AI providers Anthropic and Harvey. In the article, Don Coleman, Intapp COO, is quoted saying:
The speed of the market is exactly why checks, rules and ethical safeguards in highly regulated industries like legal matter so much. A big part of what we seek
Intapp Legal Industry Principal, Laura Saklad, shared her thoughts on AI adoption in Big Law for a Q&A in the Bloomberg Law weekly Legal Ops & Tech newsletter.
Bloomberg Law: Legal Ops & Tech – March 2, 2026
Measuring AI’s impact on Big Law