Over the last few years, employers adjusted to an expanding patchwork of pay transparency laws requiring salary ranges in job postings. Now, lawmakers are moving beyond requiring compensation disclosures and into the next phase of hiring transparency regulation: “ghost jobs” and artificial intelligence disclosures.Continue Reading ›
Latest from Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives
New York WARN Act: No AI-Related Layoffs Reported in First Year of Adding AI-Related Disclosure to the System
In 2025, the New York Department of Labor updated the state’s Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act system, asking businesses to disclose whether layoffs are related to artificial intelligence (AI). In the year since the change took effect, no business has reported AI as a reason for layoffs. This result points to one of
Illinois Department of Human Rights Imposes Regulations Regarding the Use of AI in Employment Decisions
While artificial intelligence can help streamline employment decisions, employers should be aware of emerging regulations that provide protections to employees from biases that may arise through the use of AI in employment decisions.Continue Reading ›
State Lawmakers Seek to Regulate Employer Use of AI for Wage Decisions
As employers continue finding new ways to use artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools and software to support business operations, state legislators have taken notice.Continue Reading ›
Taking Note(s): Legal Considerations When Using AI as an Office Scribe
Artificial intelligence (“AI”) has become an ever-increasing presence in the workplace. AI can help employees focus on more meaningful work by eliminating certain rote tasks including note taking or transcribing meetings. But, as with any workplace tool, some notes of caution are necessary.Continue Reading ›
California Seeks to Regulate Employer Use of AI
On February 15, 2024, California lawmakers introduced the bill AB 2930. AB 2930 seeks to regulate use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) in various industries to combat “algorithmic discrimination.” The proposed bill defines “algorithmic discrimination” as a “condition in which an automated decision tool contributes to unjustified differential treatment or impacts disfavoring people” based on various