In every crisis, half the room runs in circles while the other half picks up a clipboard and starts taking stock. The Anthropic-Pentagon dispute is that crisis, and defense contractors are deciding which half they want to be in.

The short version: The government designated a FedRAMP-authorized, facility-cleared American AI company a national security supply chain threat, via social media, after the company refused to remove safety restrictions on autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Anthropic sued days later, with the Pentagon’s own officials on the record stating the designation was “ideologically driven” with “no evidence of supply chain risk.”

Installing surveillance cameras for the business may seem like a standard security measure. But are you aware that the moment it captures any piece of personal information, it falls under the scope of the GDPR and puts you at risk of being fined up to 20 million € or 4% of your annual income? 

However,

Editor’s Note: This session during Legalweek 2026 in New York matters because it moved judicial safety out of abstraction and into the daily operating reality of courts, counsel, clients, and legal institutions. The discussion connected physical threats, digital harassment, doxxing, spoofing, swatting, online rhetoric, impeachment threats, declining public confidence in courts, and a documented drop

On 10 February 2026, the Federal Government adopted its official government draft (Regierungsentwurf) for the AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Act (KI-Marktüberwachungs- und Innovationsförderungs-GesetzKI-MIG), setting out Germany’s supervisory architecture, enforcement powers, and penalty regime for AI systems under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689).

In

@media screen and (max-width: 1023px){section[data-id=”block_f1eb472e1f204746d8a74db7aa49d055″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1365px){section[data-id=”block_f1eb472e1f204746d8a74db7aa49d055″]{ }}@media screen and (min-width: 1366px){section[data-id=”block_f1eb472e1f204746d8a74db7aa49d055″]{ }}

Tom Kemp is the Executive Director of CalPrivacy. Previously, he was a Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur and CEO. He volunteered on the California Privacy Rights Act campaign and has advised on major tech policy legislation nationwide,

In this episode, Steve Fretzin and Robert Hartmann discuss:

  • Taking ownership of the business of law
  • Building rainmaking skills through empathy and responsiveness
  • Preparing for independence before you need it
  • Networking strategically, not randomly

Key Takeaways:

  • Law school prepares lawyers for doctrine, not for marketing, leadership, or running a practice. Lawyers must take responsibility for